Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Please discuss here all your remarks and pose your questions about all racing series, except Formula One. Both technical and other questions about GP2, Touring cars, IRL, LMS, ...
User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

I think it would be interesting to compare the differences and similarities of the top sports car prototypes with the top open wheel formula. So if anybody can help with some data I would be glad to learn about:
  • lap time Spa
  • fuel consumption diesel and petrol
  • downforce
  • downforce to drag coefficient
  • weight
  • tyres
Some of the stuff I can find myself but certainly not all. I would like to find out how fuel efficient F1 and LMP1 cars are in comparison and how engine and aero specs contribute to the differences.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

roost89
roost89
0
Joined: 10 Apr 2008, 19:34
Location: Highlands, Scotland

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

I think the Ehtanol fuels should be added too as there is a difference between them as well.

I was tweeting with Lord Drayson of Drayson Racing.I was asking about the differences between the fuels they have to run E85 and E10. He said that the fuel consumption and power differences were "certainly worthwhile" when asked if the difference was large between the two. I assume that the difference is the same engine with the same air-restrictor.

Apologies that it's off-topic but I thought it somewhat relevant and interesting.
"It could be done manually. It would take quite a while, but it could be done. There is however a much more efficient and accurate way of getting the data. Men with lasers." Wing Commander Andy Green

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

on
http://www.mulsannescorner.com

theres a lot of very good info available

a baseline for getting close to current numbers could be the peter elleray interview you can find there.It is covering LMP900 but..

http://www.mulsannescorner.com/bentleyelleray.html

plus the aero figures of the 2001 Bentley speed 8

as the 2003 bentley was a fairly advanced design already I assume this will make for a good base when calcualting the downforce levels for LMP1

as for tyre size:
current Audi R15plus ,also from mulsannescorner ,latest news:

It also comes to our attention (via RCE's Sam Collins) that the R15 plus is running on 33/68-18 Michelins at the front and 37/71-18s at the rear. Same as the R15...same as the R10.

RacingManiac
RacingManiac
9
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 02:29

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

E10 is pretty widely used in US/Canada now, I believe most gasoline you can get here have 10% of ethanol content. The E85 being much less dense energy wise you would need to use more of it than gasoline(E10)....although I believe the equivalent octane rating is much higher.

I think fuel economy figure can be seen from record of Le Mans 24. I believe I've heard back in R8 days the car with FSI can run ~15 laps on 90 liter of fuel(gasoline). R10 when it had the 90 liter tank was maybe that much plus maybe 1 more? ~16laps? With 81 liter tank for the diesels I think that figure is 12-13 laps. Someone might be able to confirm that better...

Lap time at Spa in 2008, Pole for the LMS race was a 1:58.069, the fastest Q2 time for 2008's F1 race was 1:46.036.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

So LMP1 would be 11.3% slower than F1. That would be significantly outside the 107% rule of F1.

How long is a lap of Le Mans? It would be needed to calculate the fuel consumption.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:So LMP1 would be 11.3% slower than F1. That would be significantly outside the 107% rule of F1.

How long is a lap of Le Mans? It would be needed to calculate the fuel consumption.
13.629 km (8.469 mi)

LMP1 cars are consistently around 10-15 seconds a lap slower than F1 cars on the circuits they both use.

Silverstone:

2009 F1 Q2 time: 1:18.119
2009 LMS Pole time: 1.32.798

Nurburgring:

2009 F1 Q1 (Q2 was wet) time: 1:31.257
2009 LMS Pole time: 1:41.944
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

Belatti
Belatti
33
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 21:48
Location: Argentina

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

I like these kind of comparisons, feel free to add/correct the info here as I may have mixed 2008, 2009 and 2010 info:

-----------------
F1
V8 90º Gasoline
32 valve, 2.4 Liter
Engine weight 95Kg
18000 rpm max
Power arround 750 HP (guess)
Torque arround 290 Nm (guess)
Fuel consumption 60 l/100 km
Fuelling: 8 injectors supplied by a pressurized system at 100 bar
7 speed gearbox
Car Weight 620Kg
Fuel tank 200 Lts +
Wheelbase arround 3200mm aprox
Width 1800mm
Tyres Front: 245/55-13
Tyres Rear: 325/45-13

--------------------------------
Le Mans (Audi R15)
V10 90º Diesel twin-turbo
2 x 39.9 mm engine-air intake restrictor
2.94bar
40 valve, 5.5 Liter
Engine weight ???
Power arround 600 HP
Torque 1050 Nm
Fuel consumption ???
5 speed electropneumatic gearbox
Car Weight 930Kg
Fuel tank 81 Lts
Wheelbase arround 2980mm
Width 2000mm
Tyres Front: 330/68-18
Tyres Rear: 370/71-18

---------------------------------
Peugeot 908 HDi FAP
V12 100º Diesel twin-turbo
2 x 39.9 mm engine-air intake restrictor
48 valve, 5.5 Liter
Engine weight ???
Power arround 700 HP
Torque 1200 Nm
Fuel consumption ???
6 speed electropneumatic gearbox
Car Weight 930Kg
Fuel tank 81 Lts
Wheelbase arround 2950mm
Width 2000mm
Tyres Front: 330/68-18
Tyres Rear: 370/71-18
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

The 908 will be closer to 600BHP this year rather than 700 given the tightening of the air restrictors and the loss of the advantage the closed-cars got to compensate for AC.
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

Belatti
Belatti
33
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 21:48
Location: Argentina

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

WhiteBlue wrote: How long is a lap of Le Mans? It would be needed to calculate the fuel consumption.
13,6 km * 12 laps, with 80 liters of disel gives us 49 litres/100km
Still Im guessing a little bit below that.
Last edited by Belatti on 21 Apr 2010, 22:51, edited 1 time in total.
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

Oh and the current F1 V8s are 45l/100km compared with the 60l/100km of the V10s.
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

So 16 laps of Le Mans would give us 218 km.
So 90 L for 218 km would give us a base line of 41.3 L Diesel/100km
Per volume the LMP1 Diesel takes about 2/3 of the F1 fuel consumption, is that correct?
Diesel has 38.6 MJ/L
Petrol has 34.8 MJ/L
Last edited by WhiteBlue on 21 Apr 2010, 22:53, edited 1 time in total.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Belatti
Belatti
33
Joined: 10 Jul 2007, 21:48
Location: Argentina

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

Scotracer wrote:Oh and the current F1 V8s are 45l/100km compared with the 60l/100km of the V10s.
The V10s where quoted 75l/100km by F1.com

I took the 60l/100 figure from this site, so if you have another link, please post it :wink:
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

We used to have exact figures when we discussed the different engines for 2010 season.

I have checked an AMuS article which quoted 2.4 L per lap of Brazil. With a lap distance of 4.3 km I find a consumption of 55L petrol/100km.

I find:

LMP1 Diesel: 1.6 GJ/100 km
F1 Petrol: 1.9 GJ/100 km

F1 Petrol 18.8 % higher fuel consumption while the performance difference was 13%. If you compare LMP1 petrol the fuel efficiency is probably in line with the performance difference.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Scotracer
Scotracer
3
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 17:09
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

Belatti wrote:
Scotracer wrote:Oh and the current F1 V8s are 45l/100km compared with the 60l/100km of the V10s.
The V10s where quoted 75l/100km by F1.com

I took the 60l/100 figure from this site, so if you have another link, please post it :wink:
You might be right. I know one is 15l/100km less than the other. I had them mixed up. Carry on ;)
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

alelanza
alelanza
7
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 05:05
Location: San José, Costa Rica

Re: Comparison of F1 and LMP1

Post

Scotracer wrote:
Belatti wrote:
Scotracer wrote:Oh and the current F1 V8s are 45l/100km compared with the 60l/100km of the V10s.
The V10s where quoted 75l/100km by F1.com

I took the 60l/100 figure from this site, so if you have another link, please post it :wink:
You might be right. I know one is 15l/100km less than the other. I had them mixed up. Carry on ;)
It varies greatly based on circuit anyways, what we want is an average.
Alejandro L.