Renault R30

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
noname
noname
11
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 11:55
Location: EU

Re: Renault R30

Post

zgred wrote:There is strange triangle shape at the upper element end of the rear wing.
do you mean triangle cut-outs ?

it could be to improve brakes cooling.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Renault R30

Post

Looks like an F2002 Ferrari frontwing endplate. Or somesuch car. But i remember a v-cutout in that endplate as well.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

gridwalker
gridwalker
7
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 12:22
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Renault R30

Post

noname wrote:
zgred wrote:There is strange triangle shape at the upper element end of the rear wing.
do you mean triangle cut-outs ?

it could be to improve brakes cooling.
Look carefully at the middle of the rear wing in the photos posted above : there is a small triangular flick up in the middle of the wing plane.

When teams without an F-duct choose to reduce the size of their wing planes, they move the whole assembly upwards so that it meets the top of the endplates. With the Renault f-duct blowing the main plane, I would assume that it is much harder to move the whole assembly upwards because of the shape of the ducting, so it looks like they reduced the overall height of the flap instead.

I would hazard a guess that the triangular flick up is to meet a rule defining the height at which you must run the rear wing. If Renault cannot run their reduced sized flap at the mandated height due to the shape of their F-duct, it would make sense that they have added the flick up so that the wing technically matches the height specified in the regulations.
"Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine ..."

quidam
quidam
0
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 15:35

Re: Renault R30

Post

Renault at Monza :
Image

gridwalker
gridwalker
7
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 12:22
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Renault R30

Post

That pic pretty much confirms it for me : the triangular flick up in the middle of the rear wing flap is there to ensure that the wing itself conforms with the mandatory wing height without compromising the F-duct positioning.

That is a nice workaround :)
Last edited by gridwalker on 10 Sep 2010, 13:39, edited 1 time in total.
"Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine ..."

noname
noname
11
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 11:55
Location: EU

Re: Renault R30

Post

gridwalker wrote:Look carefully at the middle of the rear wing in the photos posted above (...)
sorry, my mistake. I was in the hurry and when saw "triangle shape" once looking at the photos emphasizing front wing just messed it up.

WiktorF
WiktorF
0
Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 21:40

Re: Renault R30

Post

In fact it seems that they are carrying too much downforce... Their max speed is quite low if we look at the Different teams' Vmax. It's propably becouse they can't match F-Duct with smaller rear wing.

quidam
quidam
0
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 15:35

Re: Renault R30

Post

Quite low :roll:
4 2 Lewis Hamilton 14:52:14 341.2
5 15 Vitantonio Liuzzi 14:11:28 340.4
6 14 Adrian Sutil 14:44:32 340.2
7 17 Jaime Alguersuari 15:03:30 340.0
8 23 Kamui Kobayashi 14:10:18 339.0
9 9 Rubens Barrichello 15:06:47 338.5
10 4 Nico Rosberg 14:16:42 338.0
11 11 Robert Kubica 14:28:50 338.0
12 8 Fernando Alonso 14:08:53 337.7
13 18 Jarno Trulli 14:05:27 337.2
14 3 Michael Schumacher 15:26:17 336.8
15 6 Mark Webber 14:22:31 336.0
16 19 Heikki Kovalainen 14:08:32 335.4
17 5 Sebastian Vettel 14:27:34 335.2
18 10 Nico Hulkenberg 14:07:58 335.1

tadzio89
tadzio89
0
Joined: 13 May 2009, 16:52

Re: Renault R30

Post

they run different downforce levels on Robert's car during FP2. someone noticed changes?

User avatar
zgred
9
Joined: 16 Mar 2009, 13:02

Re: Renault R30

Post

Image

Image

WiktorF
WiktorF
0
Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 21:40

Re: Renault R30

Post

quidam wrote:Quite low :roll:
4 2 Lewis Hamilton 14:52:14 341.2
5 15 Vitantonio Liuzzi 14:11:28 340.4
6 14 Adrian Sutil 14:44:32 340.2
7 17 Jaime Alguersuari 15:03:30 340.0
8 23 Kamui Kobayashi 14:10:18 339.0
9 9 Rubens Barrichello 15:06:47 338.5
10 4 Nico Rosberg 14:16:42 338.0
11 11 Robert Kubica 14:28:50 338.0
12 8 Fernando Alonso 14:08:53 337.7
13 18 Jarno Trulli 14:05:27 337.2
14 3 Michael Schumacher 15:26:17 336.8
15 6 Mark Webber 14:22:31 336.0
16 19 Heikki Kovalainen 14:08:32 335.4
17 5 Sebastian Vettel 14:27:34 335.2
18 10 Nico Hulkenberg 14:07:58 335.1
Yes, its quite low for me. Renault were always one of the fastest at the end of the straight this season.

quidam
quidam
0
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 15:35

Re: Renault R30

Post

Yes, without the F-duct :lol:

madly
madly
6
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 23:20

Re: Renault R30

Post

Image

sknguy
sknguy
3
Joined: 14 Dec 2004, 21:02

Re: Renault R30

Post

gridwalker wrote: When teams without an F-duct choose to reduce the size of their wing planes, they move the whole assembly upwards so that it meets the top of the endplates. With the Renault f-duct blowing the main plane, I would assume that it is much harder to move the whole assembly upwards because of the shape of the ducting, so it looks like they reduced the overall height of the flap instead.

I would hazard a guess that the triangular flick up is to meet a rule defining the height at which you must run the rear wing. If Renault cannot run their reduced sized flap at the mandated height due to the shape of their F-duct, it would make sense that they have added the flick up so that the wing technically matches the height specified in the regulations.
Also, just looking through some of the pics of the other teams, the Renault's seem to be running a bit more rear wing. Would this be because they may have lowered the rear wing's height a smidgen?

Carlo's
Carlo's
0
Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 12:06

Re: Renault R30

Post

Renault will have another new front wing for Singapore GP 8) Source: Renault Podcast.
"worth couple of tenths" - A. Permane.