Funny thing is Ferrari and Redbull dont have much anti dive. The arms look inline when viewed from the front for those cars.forty-two wrote:
Looks like the front suspension setup is angled quite a bit, or is this a trick of the light?
Is this what I've heard described as "Anti-dive", because if anything I would've thought that a setup like this would be inclined to allow the nose to dip significantly under braking, or at least it would if the suspension allowed more than 3mm of travel!
ringo wrote:Funny thing is Ferrari and Redbull dont have much anti dive. The arms look inline when viewed from the front for those cars.forty-two wrote:
Looks like the front suspension setup is angled quite a bit, or is this a trick of the light?
Is this what I've heard described as "Anti-dive", because if anything I would've thought that a setup like this would be inclined to allow the nose to dip significantly under braking, or at least it would if the suspension allowed more than 3mm of travel!
I think anti dive adds to the stiffness of the car, since the arms take up some of the forces when they bind. This could be an inherent drawback with their car as well compared to the redbull.
Whaty do they mean by side springs? It can't be the main springs?
developement pace is just too slow. This pace should have been there 3 races ago.Martin Whitmarsh, McLaren team principal
“We come to this race determined to end an already successful season on a high, and to consolidate our second position in the constructors’ world championship. To that end, we’ve aggressively refined our rear wing design into its final iteration, and initial tests suggest it’s delivering the additional performance we’d anticipated.
who is it are you talking about if i may ask? and what page number so i can read it (please? thanks)segedunum wrote:It's funny to think that someone on this forum earlier in this thread was fired from McLaren for sharing some nuggets with us, although in truth he didn't share very much.
It's all been deleted, he wiped it all before he left, not quite sure what he was expecting to happen after posting pictures of himself etc.megasyxx wrote:who is it are you talking about if i may ask? and what page number so i can read it (please? thanks)segedunum wrote:It's funny to think that someone on this forum earlier in this thread was fired from McLaren for sharing some nuggets with us, although in truth he didn't share very much.
I believe that mclaren have got rid of the springs completely from the front of the car, this has made the car worse on braking because there is no give at the front of the car (why jenson is struggling with locking brakes) but enables good cornering a greater top end because they can get on the power earlier which in turn maximises there strengths top end speed. if they can solve the stopping problems mclaren will fly. (if they could get some movement out of the tire ie lower pressures this could help but it would then be harder to turn the tire on get more heat in to it, or maybe get the carbon struts to give more to try to get the tire to byte under breaking.SiLo wrote:Anthony Davidson just said that Mclaren have done away with the side springs from the rear (front? cant remember) suspension which can aid traction but will lift the front of the car on turn in.