HOW THE SPORT IS KILLED

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
DarkSnape
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 15:07
Location: Bucharest

HOW THE SPORT IS KILLED

Post

How bureaucratic rules are killing the sport

Read that and coment it

Please try to imagine, Shakespeare had been forbidden writing. Mozart composing. And Edison and von Braun inventing. Then mankind not only had been robbed a big part of their culture, but the same never a light had risen to them. Once the church, theirselves lead by insanity, had made Galilei to remain silent by the Inquisition to be feared.


Formula One has caught theirselves by the new rules, Niki Lauda realized in spring 2005 made bitter. But the regimentation already had begun a lot earlier in international motorsport. Since the small-time advocate Max Mosley, ideologist and demagogue in personal union, had installed himself as Grand Inquisitor of his sport at the beginning of the nineties caused by very primitive reasons lying in his family, the whole business is a slave a bureaucratic rules. The regulations of modern Formula One are so extensive and complicated like the German tax laws - that nearly had brought the country to bankruptcy. The egomaniac, who never had achieved a good performance during his more than 60 years living, often loves to play the role of the strong leader preferring to make angry the heads of big international groups especially by his primitive hunger for power. Under Mosley´s only poor democratic legitimated functionary dictatorship the most future innovations had been banned. The sad climax of that development were the two dead drivers of Imola in 1994.

In the old days the creative ideas of single personalities like Colin Chapman or Mauro Forghieri had brought very positive influence both to the technology and the sport, but today at the same place there are anonymous collectives often hindering theirselves. Instead of great solutions (all killed at their very beginning) there are only small steps forward paid by enormous sums of money standing in no relation to the results. While the competition was determined by elegant concepts of charismatic men in the past, modern Grand Prix Racing is reduced to aerodynamics and tyres by the strict regulations. Billions of dollars are spent senselessly in wind tunnels and at tyre testing, because cheaper innovative ideas are not allowed to be realized. The single technician is very specialized for many years, but at the same time incapacitated and no longer able of global thinking. The castrated Grand Prix needs the castrated engineer living at the limit of legality sometimes also crossing it. The explosion of costs in Grand Prix Racing is caused by the rules, not by the carmakers very often critized spending billions into a terible arms race. The stricter and more bureaucratic the laws, the more expensive is the development, the more destorted is the competition and the worse becomes the sport. Systems working completely electronically in the past, today have to be brought to do nearly the same job mechanically. It is perverted to employ 1000 people for entering two racing cars only, employèes being needed to do more important jobs within their companies. Smaller teams have got no chances anymore by the ban of creative moments and so they are falling into bankruptcy. Cooper, Brabham and Lotus are still the past. Rear engine, monocoque chassis or carbon fibre technology never had been introduced under a Mosley administration. It is both an illusion and a mad idea to cut costs by restrictive rules. Reality teaches us, that the contrast of it is true. The collective is killing the individual and at the end there is the ruin, that is governed by the mob. The giant empire of the Soviet Union, strictly ruled by ideology and unflexible laws, had gone the same ways as the Kirch group, that had been determined to become a monopoly on the media sector. The pseudo-intellectual Mosley had learned absolutely nothing from history, because his suggestion of a socialistic uniform racing car with standardized systems for tyres, brakes and gearboxes seem to come from some kind of sport fascism. Grand Prix Racing is an elite sport being fundamentally different from the popular sport of soccer. Stereotyping and proletarianization of the last decades, caused by the business interests of the profit shark Ecclestone, have brought great damage to the sport as an institution. It is still robbed of it`s nature and it`s soul. We have not got a fiery stallion anymore, but a lame gelding or maybe an eunuch. Some of the circuits only have to be supplied with a roof to make the people getting protected against the weather. The heroic fighter in the cockpit batteling for the power and the glory both of his company and his nation more and more is replaced by the feminine coward, who is prattling the advertisement statements in television being created by the public relations departments of his company. Bravery has become a foreign word in this sport inspite of the fact, that VIRTUS is coming from VIR and that means: man.

No, in the old days not all the things had been better. But you need high technology different cars for exciting races, not cloned wind tunnel monsters. Today´s Grand Prix racing cars with their deformed and unnatural dimensions are looking like having made a first trip through a scrap metal press. Already Montesquieu had warned of creating too much and too extensive laws. Functionaries ever had been suspect to Tucholski. Only dictators are forbidding men to artiiculate their thoughts and to transfer them into certain projects. We need inspirations and visions for the future of Grand Prix Racing. We also need environment and ressources protecting technologies giving incentives to the publice to buy and to use such technologies. Restrictive regulations are only neccessary on the sector of safety. Otherwise every currently available technology has to be put into a Grand Prix racing car. There must be absolutely no limits on thinking or acting concerning that. The best way for reducing costs is the free competition bringing man from Stone Age into civilisation. In 2006 Grand Prix Racing, the toughest contest in the international world of sport, will become 100 years of age. Tradition and history gives us the duty to protect the legacy of our fathers, who once had to cope with a lot tougher conditions in their lives. Who wants to organize the future, has to be open for everything. The limits of man only are created by God.
Last edited by DarkSnape on 23 Mar 2006, 17:25, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Scuderia_Russ
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2004, 22:24
Location: Motorsport Valley, England.

Post

:roll:

DaveKillens
DaveKillens
34
Joined: 20 Jan 2005, 04:02

Post

Wow, pretty powerful stuff.
First off, I believe that the sport would be better off if Mosley was not involved in any way. But to hang the events of 1994 on him is unfair. Much as I dislike the man, he had nothing to do with those sad deaths.
Formula One , and in general motor racing has always had controversy and politics. From the very first pilots blasting their way around country roads in France, there was politics and controversy. And we have to understand that in the history of motor racing, we go through eras. Not only the technology of racing, tires, engines, and such, but even the public perception of racing.
But it has always been about brave men pushing the limits, and the ever increasing use of new and novel innovations to win a race. I happen to have little respect for people like Sato (as a GP driver), but I respect him as a man with courage. They all, even in this day, deserve that respect. Some are/were braver than others.. Nuvolari, Gilles... and some weren't. But I cannot bring myself to brand any one of them of any form of cowardice.
Change is constant, even this crap we find ourselves in today is different than yesterday, and ten years from now, it will be different. But Max has thrown a whole slew of rules changes at everyone.. how many different qualifying formats have we seen in the last decade? To me, that indicates incredibly poor leadership, something Max should be fired for. And Bernie... it's all about money. Yes, once upon a time he was a rebel and was incredibly passionate about the sport. But now, money is much more important to him than the actual sport itself. Although he has enough money to retire in grand luxury, and suppport his next four generations in grand luxury, if he ever had to choose between money and the actual integrity of the sport.. cash wins.
I don't like the present political climate in F1, I detest some of the rules, and upcoming new rules. But you know what? despite all this, next week I will get up in front of my TV and tune in to what I really love to see, a Grand Prix race. And most likely it will be entertaining, exciting, and things will happen that will keep us wagging our tongues for weeks to come.
I don't think the sport is dead, it's very much alive and doing very well. Some of the politics and rules make me gag. But in the end, it's what happens on the track, it's when the red lights go out and our cherished drivers do battle on the ashphalt.

User avatar
DarkSnape
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 15:07
Location: Bucharest

Post

and the adrenaline to .. nice very nice .. great man Image

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

No one forces Max to say "I'm the FIA" and since he is doing that all the time and since FIA inspected and licensed Imola even though there were hundreds of meters of concrete walls with no protective isolation than I find him and FIA responsible because in 1993 they were busy banning technology for 1994 while they didn't do anything to implement basic passive track safety.

I know this will be annoying to some because I wrote it several times already but I still say that there would be no deaths in Imola if those walls were isolated with several rows of usual old tyre barriers.

User avatar
jgredline
0
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 07:07
Location: Los Angeles

Post

Hmm
Lots to ponder :?
To finish first, first you must finish.

Venom
Venom
0
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 15:20
Location: Serbia

Post

Sorry for going little bit off the topic, but who else died in Imola apart from Senna?

I agree with manchild considering the safety aspects.

User avatar
Jason
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 09:12
Location: KL, Malaysia

Post

Venom wrote:Sorry for going little bit off the topic, but who else died in Imola apart from Senna?

I agree with manchild considering the safety aspects.
Roland Ratzenberger
Never regret what you do, but only regret what you don't do. - Jenson Button
http://batracer.com/-1FrontPage.htm?LW

User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

The Austrian in the Symtech died at Tosa I believe. And we nearly lost Rubens Barrichello to a horrific shunt coming into the final chicane.
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.

DaveKillens
DaveKillens
34
Joined: 20 Jan 2005, 04:02

Post

manchild wrote:I know this will be annoying to some because I wrote it several times already but I still say that there would be no deaths in Imola if those walls were isolated with several rows of usual old tyre barriers.
I do agree on that aspect, but we all know what hapened to Senna was a combination of many complex factors. The safety car, the low ride height,and yes, that hard concrete wall. Sad, sad, sad, one of the very saddest days of my life. it took me almost ten years to get over that, and to this day I still miss Aytron.

User avatar
Jason
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 09:12
Location: KL, Malaysia

Post

DaveKillens wrote:
manchild wrote:I know this will be annoying to some because I wrote it several times already but I still say that there would be no deaths in Imola if those walls were isolated with several rows of usual old tyre barriers.
I do agree on that aspect, but we all know what hapened to Senna was a combination of many complex factors. The safety car, the low ride height,and yes, that hard concrete wall. Sad, sad, sad, one of the very saddest days of my life. it took me almost ten years to get over that, and to this day I still miss Aytron.
Old trye barriers are softer so when a driver's head hit it it would'nt cause so much injury. Concrete walls is hard, when a driver's heads hits it the driver would die, behind the old tyres should have a low concrete wall to make no marshalls being hitted by the cars nose or rear wing.
Never regret what you do, but only regret what you don't do. - Jenson Button
http://batracer.com/-1FrontPage.htm?LW

User avatar
Sawtooth-spike
0
Joined: 28 Jan 2005, 15:33
Location: Cambridge

Post

if i am right, it was not the wall that killed him, it was something to do with the suspenson. if i am wrong can somebody plese corect me.

oh by the way a lower wall would flip the car over the wall, also would fire debry into anybody behind it. maybe they FIA can take all that profit they made :wink: and invest in reserch into new safety things for the walls, there must be something better than a stack of tyres, they have been around for a VERY long time.
I believe in the chain of command, Its the chain I use to beat you till you do what i want!!!

User avatar
Jason
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 09:12
Location: KL, Malaysia

Post

Sawtooth-spike wrote:if i am right, it was not the wall that killed him, it was something to do with the suspenson. if i am wrong can somebody plese corect me.

oh by the way a lower wall would flip the car over the wall, also would fire debry into anybody behind it. maybe they FIA can take all that profit they made :wink: and invest in reserch into new safety things for the walls, there must be something better than a stack of tyres, they have been around for a VERY long time.
Senna died because of his steering broke off and hit the concrete wall
Never regret what you do, but only regret what you don't do. - Jenson Button
http://batracer.com/-1FrontPage.htm?LW

User avatar
Scuderia_Russ
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2004, 22:24
Location: Motorsport Valley, England.

Post

Jason wrote: Senna died because of his steering broke off and hit the concrete wall
No he didn't, without wheel tethers his wheel bounced up between the wall and the monocoque and hit him on the head. Whilst I do not believe this to be sufficient enough to cause death (I'm probably very wrong here) but I also read that part of the snapped wishbone punctured his visor thus his skull. A bit grusome, yes which is probably why we don't hear much about it.

User avatar
ketanpaul
0
Joined: 08 Mar 2005, 18:50
Location: New Delhi, India

Post

cmon guys its not that bad !!! pretty aggressive stand :evil: