Rival teams waste valuable development time evaluating the concept, which is a major benefitn smikle wrote:Would this fancy wing flap be legal in F1? Does any one know how it works and the purpose of it?
Rival teams waste valuable development time evaluating the concept, which is a major benefitn smikle wrote:Would this fancy wing flap be legal in F1? Does any one know how it works and the purpose of it?
yes, the element has to have a 100mm radius, but there is no mention of "attached bubbles" or not being able to have bubbles on the wing. I like pushing the regulations, its how this sport works, so I would have to say that this is 100% legal. Nothing says you cant attach bubbles to the rear wing, and as long as the wing has a radius of 100mm i think this would (and should, imo ) pass the test.Just_a_fan wrote:I think there's a 100mm minimum radius requirement for rear wing elements so I doubt it'd be legal.
The regs allow two sections, and they may have no concave radius less than 100mm so you can't add the bubbles afterwards. The only way I can see this being F1-legal is if you could persuade the stewards that it is a gurney tab. They are allowed to be added but must not be more than 20mm in longitudinal cross section. Not sure how effective they'd be if that small though.hecti wrote:yes, the element has to have a 100mm radius, but there is no mention of "attached bubbles" or not being able to have bubbles on the wing. I like pushing the regulations, its how this sport works, so I would have to say that this is 100% legal. Nothing says you cant attach bubbles to the rear wing, and as long as the wing has a radius of 100mm i think this would (and should, imo ) pass the test.Just_a_fan wrote:I think there's a 100mm minimum radius requirement for rear wing elements so I doubt it'd be legal.
Makes sense. Flow around the hemispheres stays attached up to a certain speed & the gurney flap functions normally. Beyond a certain speed, flow cannot stay attached around they entire hemisphere, they then stall & reduce the effectiveness of the gurney flap.marekk wrote:My guess is drag reduction.
Flow around a (hemi)sphere looks like this:
and drag coeeficient:
If they manage to tune the shape to achieve Reynolds number in the range of 5x10^5 at desired top speed, drag reduces suddenly due to highly turbulent wake region forming behind.
Well, you'd have a small number of ridges separated by 200mm. I doubt it would be effective in that situation.n smikle wrote:Yeah I just read it a while ago.. So I think the spheres might be legal then. They have to be 8 inches apart though...