I'm a fan of HRT and Virgin, but from a technical point of view I have to agree the comparison between GP2 and F1 is significant.Fil wrote:Monaco GP2 Thurs Quali
1. 01:21.781
2. 01:21.876
3. 01:21.991
4. 01:22.198
Monaco F1 Thurs Prac 1 & 2 Best Times
T. Glock 01:21.815
N. Karthikeyan 01:22.066
V. Liuzzi 01:22.840
They also have full-length ground effect tunnels...bill shoe wrote:I'm a fan of HRT and Virgin, but from a technical point of view I have to agree the comparison between GP2 and F1 is significant.Fil wrote:Monaco GP2 Thurs Quali
1. 01:21.781
2. 01:21.876
3. 01:21.991
4. 01:22.198
Monaco F1 Thurs Prac 1 & 2 Best Times
T. Glock 01:21.815
N. Karthikeyan 01:22.066
V. Liuzzi 01:22.840
GP2 cars weigh almost 100 lbs more, use the same tires, and have ~200 hp less. I don't know anything about their downforce levels, but GP2 does emphasize styling as a part of bodywork design which can't help.
So I'd think any technical minded F1 fan would be intrigued by the comparison.
Will be starting Late August/Early September (at the earliest) and they will be using most of the time avalable for the 2012 car would be my guess.charan0790 wrote:Any news about the wind tunnel testing from hrt?
what about the blown diffusers?? When are FIA going to clear the situation?
Is Norbert Haug with HRT now?ESPImperium wrote:This canada upgrade will be their one big one, with a couple of detail ones later. Then they will start to understand what they have and exploit that, whitch is woth up to 1 second alone as we saw with Mercedes last year.
Haha, yeah those repsol stickers are quite aerodynamic!ESPImperium wrote:What im expecting is Hispania to gain a couple of tenths from having Sponsorship.