Diesel wrote:Is the red really red?
Why is the Mercedes logo now Silver instead of Black?
Why is the center of the 2011 wing not painted silver?
Why does the Bridgestone tyre have flash lines down the middle?
Seeing that "frame" fixed to the front of the chassis , is it fixed to the chassis via the normal nose cone fixing ?ernest wrote:These pics show something that I love about modern as opposed to say pre 1990s F1 especially Mclaren, is that even the bits that the teams use to work on their cars look so beautiful and are so well fabricated. I think in the past there was maybe a bit more soul a bit more chaotic, but it is incredible to see the level of detail that goes into every component know.
It's not like they are inviting you again anyway so let us see them..thestig84 wrote:Nothing that probably hasnt been seen before but just being safe. Stuff a bit closer to the rear with no bodywork on really. Just interesting detail pics. Also the area round the back of the garage where front wings were being constructed, tyres fitted etc.n smikle wrote:Thanks. Could you enlighten us on the interesting stuff you took?
The overlap between the flap and main plane looks smaller than normal to me.mclaren777 wrote:The Mclaren crew playing around with flow viz this morning...
Yes, what I'm getting at is that it's so upward that it hits the wing and becomes very backward instead. That doesn't look great.n smikle wrote:The more upward the wake normally indicates that the car is making a whole heap of downforce.
I would suggest the air has lost most of it's energy at that point not to do serious harm. Anyway, the bulk of air doesn't hit the wing and thats the most important part.beelsebob wrote:Yes, what I'm getting at is that it's so upward that it hits the wing and becomes very backward instead. That doesn't look great.n smikle wrote:The more upward the wake normally indicates that the car is making a whole heap of downforce.