I don't think Marcush is being paid to make the car go faster.........JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Finger pointing is not condusive to making a car go faster.
You should know this Marcush.
I don't think Marcush is being paid to make the car go faster.........JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Finger pointing is not condusive to making a car go faster.
You should know this Marcush.
I think both of your tips could be make the differences. Michael said after today's qualifying, that he had problems with the super soft tires in the first two sectors. In the soft tires, Michael and Nico post almost the same time, but maybe Michael get more toward the set-up for the race, as in the last two Sunday's he's got the upper hand in terms of race speed.Thanx marcush & adamski ...
Michael doesn`t like to much the new Pirreli tyre, don`t you think ?
I`ve red it has a new construction in order to increase the tyre life, but it also increased the under steer, unfortunately for him ...
Could this change be the reason why Michael in the last couple of races got better lap times then Rosberg and in Qualy did the opposite? Or maybe his strategy is shifted towards the race, when it counts?
I read they were going back up to a headcount of 550 sames Ferrari and Maccamarcush. wrote:jet don´t try to find the differences in our view of things.
I think Brawn has done the right thing ,he saved the team when nobody was prepared to stand in and commit.
So he deserves aall the credit and any amount of money this deal has brought to him.To me the ddisappointment started when Brawn and the official Mercedes line tried to first maintain the stance we are the World champions ,we have hired two very good drivers and we will fight for championships instead of telling the world how it is:
the team is reduced to a core ,key people are already gone ,the team is waiting for the other teams to reduce their headcount to RRA size levels before you can think of competing at the front again.
I´d think this was deep inside the plan but they tried to be more and possibly hoped for a Schumacher factor bridging the gap and performing a few miracles..and it just did not pan out like this...
Maybe Monza, X. I don't count on them much for Spa, anyway!xpensive wrote:I have to admit that I was taken by that glimmer in China, but that was obviously due to that being a serious power-track.
But who knows what Spa and Moza will bring?
On second thought, you are right of course, Spa is far too demanding track for them.Morteza wrote:Maybe Monza, X. I don't count on them much for Spa, anyway!xpensive wrote:I have to admit that I was taken by that glimmer in China, but that was obviously due to that being a serious power-track.
But who knows what Spa and Monza will bring?
I think they should be good in Monza. I mean they will be closer a bit then usually. (maybe under 1 sec/lap)Ferraripilot wrote:Even Monza won't bring much for them IMO as their mechanical grip is no good