really marcus? you realise it was a wet session with very little running? the DRS wasnt even in use was it.marcush. wrote:But their trapspeeds are not that impressive yet ?
really marcus? you realise it was a wet session with very little running? the DRS wasnt even in use was it.marcush. wrote:But their trapspeeds are not that impressive yet ?
Looking for mounds of tehcno babble?xpensive wrote:Good Lord, is this still a Technical forum?ringo wrote: ...
The redbull shape is the optimum.
...
It's not like last year with new front wings and changes to the double diffuser every race is it? A few changes to the packaging and the rear wing and some tweaks to the front wing and that's about it.raymondu999 wrote:Come to think of it though; Red Bull and McLaren have both kind of "stagnated" in a way, haven't they? I haven't seen many (visible) upgrades on either car for a while now. Except for the new Rear wing on the McLaren, naturally
It wouldn't have damaged much tbh; The lower end of the endplates scrape the ground a lotBanki wrote:Hamilton's car damaged better i think. His front wing touched the asphalt at the Bus stop
The even have titanium skid blocks there to allow the wing to scrape without damaging it.raymondu999 wrote:It wouldn't have damaged much tbh; The lower end of the endplates scrape the ground a lotBanki wrote:Hamilton's car damaged better i think. His front wing touched the asphalt at the Bus stop