The harder you go the more work is transferred into the tyres think in extremes -solid front suspension all vertical movement is either soaked up by the tyre sidewall (mainly undamped)or flex...MIKEY_! wrote:What happened to the super sharp/hard front, soft rear thing they had going. Not that that was stopping Button from locking up... The harder front should lessen the porpoising.
From what I gather from the F1 website, the only damage was the suspension got knocked slightly out of line, which I think that they can change under parc-ferme if it's damaged but I'm not 100% sure on that.Banki wrote:I'm worry about Hamilton's car. Can they repair his car completely?![]()
Thank you.ajdavison2 wrote:From what I gather from the F1 website, the only damage was the suspension got knocked slightly out of line, which I think that they can change under parc-ferme if it's damaged but I'm not 100% sure on that.Banki wrote:I'm worry about Hamilton's car. Can they repair his car completely?![]()
ajdavison2 wrote:It's not flexing, it's broken from the first corner collision, a force india went into the back of him.
Pretty interesting given that they were running their mega-skinny rear wing... Problems for monza?Banki wrote:ajdavison2 wrote:It's not flexing, it's broken from the first corner collision, a force india went into the back of him.)))
Hamilton said they had too much downforce![]()
I think beelsebob's point was, how much skinnier can they make the wing when it's already so skinny? McL (and Red Bull, it has to be said) are running so little wing it looks that when their DRS is open, there's no part of the wing that goes vertical. So how much more can they trim for Monza?Poleman wrote:Downforce...Easier to remove it if its there than adding it.I think they will learn from this and they will be just fine in Monza.They took risk on setup counting on 50-50 conditons or wet.The amount of downforce cant be explained otherwise.