Given the way that Lewis got outdragged at the start, I think gearing was definitely a factor : he just didn't seem to have either acceleration from slow speed, nor the top speed we expect from a Merc engine.
I think he was gambling on the rain.
Yes, the porpoising certainly seems to be confined to the heavy breaking zones such as at Les Coombes and Bus Stop. Often with the cars producing such great forces under braking the actual asphalt surface becomes rolled up in the heavy breaking areas which makes the approach to the the corner bumpy. With the Mclaren favouring a stiffly sprung front end the effect of this will be exagerated causing the car to appear unstable in the breaking zone. Normally the bouncing causes lock ups as the car goes light and then heavy but the Mclaren must have a pretty good heave/rebound set up otherwise they'd be locking up lap after lap and the they'd soon have square tyres.marcush. wrote:The harder you go the more work is transferred into the tyres think in extremes -solid front suspension all vertical movement is either soaked up by the tyre sidewall (mainly undamped)or flex...MIKEY_! wrote:What happened to the super sharp/hard front, soft rear thing they had going. Not that that was stopping Button from locking up... The harder front should lessen the porpoising.
so if you get a frequency of excitation in your usual driving envelope without damping this will lead to some sort of oscillation ....porpoising or strong vertical movements -underdamped-the amplitude is huge but as the car is changing variables quickly and the issue seems to be only under certain conditions (not on the straight at constant speed)it appears and disappears quickly enough to give the drivers a chance to drive through the phenomenom by the looks of things...like a imbalance in the wheels..sort of.
beelsebob wrote:Yes, yes I did, and yes they were. The only driver to get within 0.5 seconds of Hamilton's Q3 middle sector was vettel, and even he was slower. This was also the first time that any driver had got within 0.5 - vettel's other laps had significantly slower middle sectors. Vettel made all his time on Hamilton in the first sector. http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/f1 ... ectors.pdf. During the closing laps, button was closing 0.1 on Alonso in the first sector, 0.3 in the final sector, and between 0.7 and 1.1 in the middle sector.ell66 wrote:did even watch the live timings? at no point was lewis or jenson 0.5-1sec faster in the middle sector.
fact is lewis ran to much df and got mugged at he start of the race. jeson hd an ideal set up and i think theyl be just fine for monza.
Listen from 2:17.0 here http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0 ... rand_Prix/ Oh look "Button has gained 7 tenths on him, just on the downhill sector alone".
Yes, but do not forget that Hamilton had been behind Kobayashi, and when he opened his wing, was able to pull out and pass him, being with less drag. Kobayashi just braked later than Hamilton, or else Hamilton just thought that he had a faster car and that Kobayashi wouldn't fight back.richard_leeds wrote:Yup, a car pulling alongside you from 2 or 3 lengths behind when your DRS is open is a bit embarrassing!
To be fair, the Sauber was well and truly wedged in the slip stream of the McLaren, that accounts for at least a DRS worth of overspeed.richard_leeds wrote:No. Hamilton passed Kobyashi on the straight after La Source (1) without any DRS. Then Kobyashi followed Hamilton through Eau Rouge (2,3&4) and had enough speed on the Kemmel straight to catch up.
Getting close in the Slipstream is one thing, Steering out of it and passing while the other one has his DRS open is another....Kamui was faster without DRS than Hamilton with DRS. Either DRS wasn't effective or Hamilton was short geared.beelsebob wrote:To be fair, the Sauber was well and truly wedged in the slip stream of the McLaren, that accounts for at least a DRS worth of overspeed.
That's rather the point though – Kamui steered out of it, got half way along side, and then the drag washed his overspeed off and he pulled back again.Mandrake wrote:Getting close in the Slipstream is one thing, Steering out of it and passing while the other one has his DRS open is another....Kamui was faster without DRS than Hamilton with DRS. Either DRS wasn't effective or Hamilton was short geared.beelsebob wrote:To be fair, the Sauber was well and truly wedged in the slip stream of the McLaren, that accounts for at least a DRS worth of overspeed.