During the end or the later part of a sting the gap goes to almost 1s. RBR is very easy on its Tyres while Mercedes is not.diego1960 wrote:Where does everyone see the 1s difference? Comparing the times posted above, in most laps the difference is half a second. Unless we take extreme laps into consideration which is difficult to judge as Schumacher or Webber might have fallen into traffic.
Mr.S wrote:Yes Mclaren & Mercedes are on a more similar pace. Mercedes maybe slightly quicker. Red Bull look from a different planet. Like Close 1 Full Second away from the restFerraripilot wrote:RB is definitely very easy on tires once again. MB and Mclaren definitely look very close though. Even with Jensen on meds
It's not that remarkable – they were into the 1:24s in their third stint yesterday.Ferraripilot wrote:Mr.S wrote:Yes Mclaren & Mercedes are on a more similar pace. Mercedes maybe slightly quicker. Red Bull look from a different planet. Like Close 1 Full Second away from the restFerraripilot wrote:RB is definitely very easy on tires once again. MB and Mclaren definitely look very close though. Even with Jensen on meds
RB's pace after their third pit stop is just remarkable. If it's real
The simplest way to disguise pace is to run the engine at 16k or 17k rpm. Then the driver can drive as normal, KERS as normal, DRS as normal, weight distribution is normal, hence they get valid data for the engineers.Giblet wrote:The DRS wing and KERS really screws up testing for the fans. Its like the perfect sandbagging tool and could skew the results by a couple seconds.
How do we know a fast lap didn't involve 15 seconds of KERS and DRS everywhere, or the exact opposite using none?
schumacher on hard and webber on medium acording to amusLorenzo_Bandini wrote:Autosport said Webber run hard tyres.. If it's true, it's simple :
- Mercedes car is a big doog.
OR
- The season is already over.