Williams FW34 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

mith wrote:
Oneshortplanck wrote:
JackHammer wrote:Is that a levitating monkey seat?! :P =D>
Such a lovely rear end, and already looking stronger than last year
i wonder if that can flex down at speed?
is there a simalar 'flexy wing test' for monkie seats?
Flexing of that monkey sit wouldn't be desired because it's equal to loosing part of usable energy by converting it into elastic energy. It's different story with front wing, because there the point of flexing is to get it low enough to benefit from some ground effect. Or so I believe ;)
Depends if you want to lose drag at high speed. Should that be desirable then you may trade some downforce for less drag down the straights only to have the monkey seat flex back up once you slow down for the corner. Same reason some teams in the past have been bending the rear wings backwards at speed (e.g. Red Bull were shown to do this a couple of seasons ago with some videos where you could see the shark fin staying still and the rest of the rear wing flexing backwards reducing the angle of attack).

User avatar
mith
0
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 18:03
Location: Wrocław, Poland

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

I didn't thought about shedding some drag with flexing it, but that sounds reasonable. BTW, I've seen videos of flexing rear wings, just forgot I did, cause it was quite some time ago ;)

User avatar
AnthonyG
38
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 13:16

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

Blackout wrote::-k

Image
Strange, I don't think I've seen that on raceday.
Anyone got a pic of it during raceday?
Thank you really doesn't really describe enough what I feel. - Vettel

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

Manchild called it. Decent car. Hopefully they'll have the resources to sustain it.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

User avatar
AnthonyG
38
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 13:16

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

I don't think they're new, but I find these 2 elements "intresting"
Image
Thank you really doesn't really describe enough what I feel. - Vettel

Oneshortplanck
Oneshortplanck
0
Joined: 04 Apr 2011, 22:48

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

AnthonyG wrote:I don't think they're new, but I find these 2 elements "intresting"
[/img]
are you refering to the shrouds on the suspension?

edit,
i see a little notch at end of floor and brake duct /suspension shroud
Do not argue with an idiot. She will drag you down to her level and beat you with experience.

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

A reminder this is a car thread. We seem to be talking about the relative performance, and who works there.

Please use the team threads to discuss every about the team that is not a development or discussion on the car.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

Alexgtt
Alexgtt
8
Joined: 07 Feb 2011, 15:49
Location: UK

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

I'm fairly sure the switch to Renault engines has allowed the rear end with that low gearbox all work so much better. The engine bay areo looks tidier than anyone's on the grid and that of course is also due to the engine packaging from Renault. I so hope they can throw the development at it. The foundation is there for a great car.

User avatar
N12ck
11
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 19:10

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

I remember when I said this car is a good car, and people doubted me :lol: the williams lowline gearbox may be working better with this years aero package with a cleaner rear end, I do believe the renault switch was one of the keys to unlocking the potential in the gearbox helping the aerodynamics :D
Budding F1 Engineer

User avatar
Gridlock
30
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

Indeed, Williams Cosworth belongs in the same sealed box as McLaren Peugeot. Sucks being poor.

It's a real shame that dorsal fin is aerodynamically desirable, without it the Williams would look stunning from the side. Imagine this car with a pre-2009 RW for god's sake...

=D> to the team, every time during the race I heard "That Williams is definitely being held up by the Ferrari" or similar I got a bit giddy, child of the 90s that I am :)
#58

User avatar
roadie
39
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 13:52

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

I believe the dorsal fin is written into the regulations for greater real estate for showing sponsorship...

Anyway, I was extremely impressed with Pastors pace in the FW34 in clear air. The car looks great on track and I look forward to seeing how it performs in Malaysia. I assume that they will be running the extra cooling we saw briefly in Barcelona there!

User avatar
FrukostScones
163
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

Image
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

Great shot! Where did you get it?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

AMUS judging by the URL.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
ringo
240
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Williams FW34 Renault

Post

cooling on this car is feat. Suprised how they manage to push air through that space. Where does it go with a "shell back" engine cover like that?
No key hole cooling exits or anything.
For Sure!!