Never knew a windows desktop was such a serious piece of Formula 1, however he did have wind forcast/modelling for the circuit up earlier and may of seen me coming up to take a snap of his new work space
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb719/fb71942656b09a4408a399b1e046dd8ecde1351f" alt="Razz :P"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32040/3204001c1068dd265cb1caabdd6ca808d9dba715" alt="Image"
Hail22 wrote:Very serious business at Mclaren, look at Sam Michaels body language xD
Never knew a windows desktop was such a serious piece of Formula 1, however he did have wind forcast/modelling for the circuit up earlier and may of seen me coming up to take a snap of his new work space![]()
Don't get how that's worse? I have far fewer problems with my tried and tested and fully debugged Windows XP based work laptop than my Windows 7 home laptop...kilcoo316 wrote:Hail22 wrote:Very serious business at Mclaren, look at Sam Michaels body language xD
Never knew a windows desktop was such a serious piece of Formula 1, however he did have wind forcast/modelling for the circuit up earlier and may of seen me coming up to take a snap of his new work space![]()
Worst is... they are still using XP!
The 2GB uninterrupted address space limit in XP means it can be very restrictive for engineering applications.adrianjordan wrote:Don't get how that's worse?
Depends what you're doing with it. I doubt that the displays on the pit wall are doing much more than acting as dumb terminals relaying information being processed elsewhere. So being unable to allocate vast swathes of RAM probably isn't very limiting for their needs.kilcoo316 wrote:The 2GB uninterrupted address space limit in XP means it can be very restrictive for engineering applications.adrianjordan wrote:Don't get how that's worse?
7 has far better networking and has better simultaneous processing capabilities.
I don't use XP anymore, while it did eventually become rock solid, it was also no longer fit for purpose for me, I couldn't live inside the memory limits, even with the PAE enabled.
Nope. All the recent processors have PAE support, that means they can address more than 4GiB of ram even with a 32bit kernel.raymondu999 wrote:Wouldn't you need 64-bit to use more than 3.3GB anyways? It's been a while since I stayed on the edge of hardware technological advancement though
It's dependent on the Operating system, Microsoft routinely limits 32bit consumer OS's to 4gb even with PAE switched on. There are unofficial patches to get around that, but system stability is hit and miss (drivers tend to throw a wobbly).Federico wrote:Nope. All the recent processors have PAE support, that means they can address more than 4GiB of ram even with a 32bit kernel.raymondu999 wrote:Wouldn't you need 64-bit to use more than 3.3GB anyways? It's been a while since I stayed on the edge of hardware technological advancement though
So Rob Smedley must be using XP thentaperoo2k wrote:It's dependent on the Operating system, Microsoft routinely limits 32bit consumer OS's to 4gb even with PAE switched on. There are unofficial patches to get around that, but system stability is hit and miss (drivers tend to throw a wobbly).Federico wrote:Nope. All the recent processors have PAE support, that means they can address more than 4GiB of ram even with a 32bit kernel.raymondu999 wrote:Wouldn't you need 64-bit to use more than 3.3GB anyways? It's been a while since I stayed on the edge of hardware technological advancement though
Kaboom tish.raymondu999 wrote:So Rob Smedley must be using XP then
WIN.myurr wrote:Kaboom tish.raymondu999 wrote:So Rob Smedley must be using XP then
XP is also available in 64 bits version.taperoo2k wrote:It's dependent on the Operating system, Microsoft routinely limits 32bit consumer OS's to 4gb even with PAE switched on. There are unofficial patches to get around that, but system stability is hit and miss (drivers tend to throw a wobbly).Federico wrote:Nope. All the recent processors have PAE support, that means they can address more than 4GiB of ram even with a 32bit kernel.raymondu999 wrote:Wouldn't you need 64-bit to use more than 3.3GB anyways? It's been a while since I stayed on the edge of hardware technological advancement though
I'm guessing that McLaren might be running XP in a virtual environment on the pitwall, the benefit of that being you only need one computer/server to do it.
Compability in Windows 7 Ultimate/Enterprise is easy peasy - XP Mode. You can either run a virtual XP desktop or run it in the background. Just means you can use legacy apps without much trouble.
The MP4-27 looks like a nicely designed and packaged car so far. The titling wings look like another nifty design by McLaren.