Rain masters of Formula 1 1980-now

[Nando]

If you have statistics of other drivers, post it up please,

Percentage of wet WDC race wins only.

60% - Ayrton Senna

40% - Lewis Hamilton
40% - Michael Schumacher

24% - Damon Hill
24% - Kimi Raikkonen

22% - Sebastian Vettel

16% - Keke Rosberg
15% - Nigel Mansell

9% - Rubens Barrichello
9% - Thierry Boutsen
9% - Alain Prost

[JimClarkFan]

What are these stats?

% of their total victories, % of wet races that they won in their career?

[myurr]

What are these stats?

% of their total victories, % of wet races that they won in their career?

Judging by Senna's percentage it's the latter.

[Nando]

What are these stats?

% of their total victories, % of wet races that they won in their career?

Try reading the whole post

"Percentage of wet WDC race wins only."

So amount of wet races versus how many of those you won.

[myurr]

What are these stats?

% of their total victories, % of wet races that they won in their career?

Try reading the whole post

"Percentage of wet WDC race wins only."

So amount of wet races versus how many of those you won.

It's actually ambiguous, so probably not good to get on a moral high horse over it.

Does JCF mean:
% wet races won / total races won
% wet races won / % wet races raced in
% wet races won in a championship winning year / % wet races won in a championship winning year
% wet races won in a championship winning year / % wet races driven in a championship winning year

I'm sure there are probably other interpretations as well (e.g. % wet races won / total races driven). All those are valid for the description "Percentage of wet WDC race wins only". I suspect it's actually the second one down, % wet races won / % wet raced raced in. That would actually be the most meaningful, although all are subject to the usual caveats about not being truly representative.

[beelsebob]

What are these stats?

% of their total victories, % of wet races that they won in their career?

Try reading the whole post

"Percentage of wet WDC race wins only."

So amount of wet races versus how many of those you won.

It's actually ambiguous, so probably not good to get on a moral high horse over it.

Does JCF mean:
% wet races won / total races won
% wet races won / % wet races raced in
% wet races won in a championship winning year / % wet races won in a championship winning year
% wet races won in a championship winning year / % wet races driven in a championship winning year

I'm sure there are probably other interpretations as well (e.g. % wet races won / total races driven). All those are valid for the description "Percentage of wet WDC race wins only". I suspect it's actually the second one down, % wet races won / % wet raced raced in. That would actually be the most meaningful, although all are subject to the usual caveats about not being truly representative.

None of the above...
total wet races won / total wet races raced in.

[myurr]

Stupidly that's actually what I meant. Need to engage brain more, type less