They may look smooth, but they don't seem to be moving up on Williams, TR, or Sauber at this point.
Bolt some of the good parts on boys!
Maynard G. Krebs wrote:They may look smooth, but they don't seem to be moving up on Williams, TR, or Sauber at this point.
Bolt some of the good parts on boys!
perhaps they are just focusing on long run instead of qualifying at the moment. Maybe like Williams, they will give us some surprises next week.bosanac1 wrote:it doesn't look good at all so far
last season they were missing 0.5 second sometimes less for middlefield and having KERS this season you would think they would be up there
but so far they seem to be not even close
Agreed. IMO most great products are born from a great idea, not buckets of cash. Sauber set the trend this year with it's exhausts, a simple yet powerful idea that was relatively inexpensive to implement and as such we saw the field copy and then go on to refine and modify that idea.marcush. wrote:HRT ,Marussia and Caterham have in common they are relatively new as an outfit but otherwise they all employ or employed expertise galore of current F1 knowledge and use facilities that are state of the art ..
I think they lack refinements. I believe they have all the right ingredients on the car but not the cash to refine them. The wings, the floor, the brake ducts, all foetal shapes when you campare the car with the likes of RedBull and Williams. With the new guy from Mclaren I think they can get a little more bang for the buck next year.Monster_Energy_F1 wrote:Just a question guys. No right or wrong here but after Caterham launched their 2012 car first, before Ferrari, Mclaren, Red Bull and Lotus me and a few others expected good things from Caterham. Especially since they launched confidentally and on time.
So why have they still not had a point? Where has it gone wrong?
Cheers,
Dom:D