If you hadn't noticed it yet, there were many many non-DDRS posts.mx_tifoso wrote:Hey everyone, to allow for normal discussion about this car's development all of the posts about the DDRS have been split off into a new thread. This now allows us to cover both topics without them hindering one another.
Lotus E20 DDRS
mx_tifoso wrote:Hey everyone, to allow for normal discussion about this car's development all of the posts about the DDRS have been split off into a new thread. This now allows us to cover both topics without them hindering one another.
I agree with this.MarkedOne8 wrote: I think that you, as a moderator / administrator, SHOULD NOT show to others for which team / driver you are cheering for.
2nd this!MarkedOne8 wrote:
I think that you, as a moderator / administrator, SHOULD NOT show to others for which team / driver you are cheering for.Send us some NEUTRAL administrators / moderators, or leave us alone completely.
Don't bother this, this has been going on since day 1 when Tomba mode some people mods. Pretty much everyone is complaining about unnecessary topic splits, merges, etc. etc. But the decision made is good because there are around 4 people who like it, compared to a 100 fold who don't.MarkedOne8 wrote: I think that you, as a moderator / administrator, SHOULD NOT show to others for which team / driver you are cheering for.Send us some NEUTRAL administrators / moderators, or leave us alone completely.
This is how it has been done, when a certain new topic within a thread starts to overwhelm it is split off. The way we see it is so that we can continue the normal development posts in car threads, as seen during GP weekends. But since the DDRS (or whatever name you prefer) had 32, I thought it would be best to give it its own thread, and seeing how someone had actually already done it on Saturday, I just merged them into that one.bhallg2k wrote:Far be it from me to quell any rage against "the man" - or the machine, for that matter - but is it possible this is a bit much here? Novelty features are removed from the main threads all the time. It's annoying, yes. But, it's consistent, too.
Helmholtz exhaust, Red Bull engine maps, various Ferrari aero components, various Ferrari liveries...they're all divorced from any car threads. It is what it is.
...
mx_tifoso wrote:This is how it has been done, when a certain new topic within a thread starts to overwhelm it is split off. The way we see it is so that we can continue the normal development posts in car threads, as seen during GP weekends. But since the DDRS (or whatever name you prefer) had 32, I thought it would be best to give it its own thread, and seeing how someone had actually already done it on Saturday, I just merged them into that one.bhallg2k wrote:Far be it from me to quell any rage against "the man" - or the machine, for that matter - but is it possible this is a bit much here? Novelty features are removed from the main threads all the time. It's annoying, yes. But, it's consistent, too.
Helmholtz exhaust, Red Bull engine maps, various Ferrari aero components, various Ferrari liveries...they're all divorced from any car threads. It is what it is.
...
And blaming it on Ferrari or Obama is completely baseless. Get a hold of yourself, as in my moderator actions I never show preference, and I can pinky swear on that. I did this to benefit the thread, period.
On British broadcaster Sky’s ’F1 Show’, television pundit Ted Kravitz explained that - unlike Mercedes’ pioneering device - the Lotus version is in fact not attached to the rear wing DRS.MarkedOne8 wrote:I still can't believe that someone has made such a stupid decision!
You think that Lotus' only improvement is DDRS?
Maybe it's not even about DRS.
We were even talking about new nosecone, aka pelican, and that has nothing to do about DRS, too, but these posts are moved together with DDRS posts.
)