manchild wrote:There is no such thing as good dictator. Under any dictator part of society sufferes so that isn't good for the country as whole. Country and government are two different things but always equalized by dictators...
You only need to look at Singapore to argue against that claim. It works well for them. If anything, the parts of Singapore society that suffers under their rule are drug-dealers and criminals who, in reality, no-one should really waste too much time crying over.
It's not the best analogy to F1. Cars, drivers and teams are free to not compete in F1 remember.
I think it would do F1 well to sort its messages out properly and do away with the recent practices which are constantly being the subject of debate. When the talking points of a sport are so often about the rules and interpretation it's always bad.
For one I think all technical investigations should publically name the person who instigated it. It's common knowledge in the paddock (well, according to two friends of mine who work in F1) that Ferrari put a massive effort into questioning every possible area of the rules in order to get the Renault mass-damper system looked at and banned. If this was common knowledge to everyone people would think twice about conducting themselves like this and thereby creating the bad blood which has increased in F1 this year.
Alonso got a five slot demotion for arguably slightly hindering Massa during qualifying, with tons of mitigating circumstances and evidence. Yet only month earlier Schumy undeniably cheated at Monaco to damge the chances of anyone beating him and only got put back twice as far as Alonso. Surely he should have been disqualified completely? The disproportionate levels of punishment are sometimes laughable.
Rob W