manchild wrote:Rob W wrote: It works well for them. If anything, the parts of Singapore society that suffers under their rule are drug-dealers and criminals who, in reality, no-one should really waste too much time crying over.
....Peaceful demonstrators also faced penalties. At least 24 Jehovah's Witnesses were imprisoned during the year. Death sentences continued to be imposed and at least two executions were known to have been carried out.
and here (caninig)
http://www.pekingduck.org/archives/000383.php
HRW wrote:There are under-18s in government armed forces as voluntary recruits are accepted from the age of 16...
Domestic workers face a wide range of grave abuses and labor exploitation, including physical and sexual abuse, forced confinement, non-payment of wages, denial of food and health care and excessive working hours with no rest days...
I stay by my opinion - there is no good dictatorship.
I suppose that's a fair arguement but I don't think either the harsh punishment of what they see as criminals nor the military service really have much to do with Singapore being a dictatorship. They still have a parliament to work on the wording and tabling of laws. Malaysia and Thailand, both democracies, have equally as harsh laws on drugs. Likewise, Israel and Sweden, democracies both, have compulsary military service.
Also, physical (and sexual) abuse or otherwise of workers is commonplace in many many countries such as Indonesia, most central african nations etc - many of which are democracies.
I think the process and motivation by which laws/rules are passed and the culture within Govt depts with regards to crime, corruption etc are far more open to bad end-results with dictatorships but definitely not exclusive to them. I've stayed in Singapore many times and while some of their laws seem overly harsh compared to where I come from, New Zealand, they don't make me feel opressed or hard done by.
Rob W