GrizzleBoy wrote:While I'm happy the FIA didn't just gloss over todays incident.....
I too am sickened at how they grabbed Grosjean by the neck and threw him in a dungeon without hesitation like an iron fisted representation of law, yet they continue to simply cower behind the 50 foot stick they use to periodically poke Maldonado on his arm every time he does something naughty.
This exactly. I'm not saying Grosjean's penalty wasn't warranted, I'm saying where is the consistency? Was Jarno Trulli penalized for driving up Karun Chandhok's ass-end? No. But because there was a lot of carbon on the ground and he hit some people at the top of the WDC food chain, Grosjean gets penalized.
What would the response be if this happened further back in the grid? If Kovalainen had bumped into Pic (not that the Marussia would ever be beside another car.

) and crashed out Senna, Glock, de la Rosa, and Ricciardo would the penalty have been as bad? No. No it would not have. Absolutely not. In no possible way.
This is BS. By saying the incident "took leading championship contenders out of the race" you are saying, point blank, that they are worth more than those at the back of the grid.
BULLSHIT.
If it is unsafe driving penalize it as such and be done there. If you're going to start penalizing for bumping into people in contention for the WDC then where was Maldonado's race ban for putting Hamilton into a wall? At what point do you decide who's in contention and who isn't? Grosjean may be 100 points out but goddamn all it takes is four good races and a couple of incidents and he's right there with the rest.
The conspiracy theorist in my wants to say that by "leading championship contender" they meant to say "a Ferrari". Luckily that guy only exists to close out posts.
