I was reading about Charlie Whiting on Planetf1 and thought it was a topic worth discussing. As far a being race controller I have no problem with him... but, when it comes to being the person who gets to see and have knowledge of all technical aspects of every team's cars, it seems very odd that someone with close friendships with (any) team could seriously be considered impartial.
What do you think?
That Charlie is known as being a friend of Ross Brawn's is one thing, but being in a position to disclose or use information against or for any team - even inadvertently - seems very wrong. Such a potential conflict wouldn't be allowed in almost any other sport.
I also think that, such as in instances of the mass-damper affair, all protests by teams be made public. It's highly likely that Ferrari instigated the process and probably even got their team of lawyers to find a way to make the mass-damper 'illegal'. But we can't really know for sure that they were involved can we? So conspiracy theories arise from it. Perhaps it would be better for the sport if all complaints/technical challenges were out in the open.
Rob W