<Taken from the formula1.com.Unless wet tyres have been used, drivers must use both dry tyre compounds during a race and failure to do so will see them excluded from the results. Or if the race is suspended and can't be restarted, 30 seconds will be added to the elapsed race time of any driver who hasn't used both compounds.
After watching the Australian GP and the high levels of deg on the SS compound it would arguably have been better to be able to race the full race on the medium compounds, I heard several times that the medium is the better race tyre. Now this is where my question comes in, obviously the rules state that both tyres have to be used in a dry race but what actually counts as 'being used'? My question is in several parts.
a) Is there a minimum usage for tyres, I.e. do the drivers have to complete a minimum of 1 lap on a set of tyres?
b) Would being able to just use the mediums, and the speed disadvantage they bring vs the SS be worth it for the better levels of deg?
c) This is where my theory comes in, It would only work for drivers who have started on the medium compounds. Basically if driver X starts on the mediums, pits, switches to the SS, BUT doesn't leave the pits and immediately goes back onto mediums do the Ss tyres count as being used, and therefore can he run the rest of the race on the mediums?
This would involve sacrificing, I imagine, about 8 seconds in the pits (4ish per set of tyres). And I'm not sure if over a stint, it would be worth it. we've all seen what happens when drivers go off the cliff on the SS, (RAI last year in.. bahrain?, Sutil this year in Melbourne. and the loss seems to be more than 4 seconds.
So yeah, just spit balling a theory.