You mean that teamorder that Webber didnt hear? Also do you mean that teamorder where Webber didnt overtake Vettel? If so, yeah that was a huge shame of Webbermnmracer wrote:Wow...
I can't remember there being so much drama after Webber ignored teamorders in Silverstone '11, but for some reason the whole F1 circus is imploding because Vettel gave the viewers a race rather than a progression.
So, first you go bash Webber for breaking a team order(which he didnt even do), and then you go praise Vettel for the same thing? Seriously?Thinking back to a certain driver who said "if you no longer go for a gap that exists you are no longer a racing driver because we are competing, we are competing to win", it got me thinking, what other drivers would have also gone for the win in this situation?
He had quite the shot at it in 2010Raptor22 wrote:you don;t deserve want yo haven't earned and Webber has no earned a shot at the WDC title yet. He has not been able to follow through. He's a choker
Basically.Tomba wrote:I really fail to see the point of this vote. Who does what depends on the context, the rivalry, the era, the moment in the championship this happens, and so on, and so on. Knowing this, the poll is simply irrelevant and impossible to reply on.
Rosberg showed what it takes to be a team player and be calm about it. Vettel simply put his own interests ahead of the team. That's all there is to this. Anyone who thinks differently is just not thinking.
why, just because VET acted like Senna and some can't handle that.bhallg2k wrote:I've been good lately, but this one is just tooooo pathetic to pass up.
Dude, your hero ignored his team and then lied about it in front of millions of people. This really happened; we all saw it.
And it's OK. Not even for one second do I begrudge him this, because all F1 drivers are overgrown children who look out for themselves first and foremost. That's what they're trained to do from the very beginning. It's why they succeed.
It only gets ugly when the infantile contingents of those who follow these overgrown children cannot accept the occasionally atrocious behavior of their idols and need to justify it in one way or another as acceptable practice. I thought the race thread was bad enough, what with its duplicitous back-and-forth between those who attack and defend whoever or whatever is in the best interest of their particular allegiance at the time. But, to start a thread in search of some sort of popularly fabricated exculpation of something so plainly wrong is just...weak. Puny. Lame.
Sad.
Sebastian Vettel is not a saint, and putting him in league with any other driver will not change that.
If that is your reply, then I can't see how you've read what he posted.FrukostScones wrote: why, just because VET acted like Senna and some can't handle that.
You mean the year in which vettel was forced to relinquish his assured victory due to car failures in bahrain, australia and korea trough no fault of his own?wesley123 wrote:He had quite the shot at it in 2010Raptor22 wrote:you don;t deserve want yo haven't earned and Webber has no earned a shot at the WDC title yet. He has not been able to follow through. He's a choker
While this is certainly true, one of them is a triple WC and the other one has a single victory to his name.GrizzleBoy wrote:Basically.Tomba wrote:I really fail to see the point of this vote. Who does what depends on the context, the rivalry, the era, the moment in the championship this happens, and so on, and so on. Knowing this, the poll is simply irrelevant and impossible to reply on.
Rosberg showed what it takes to be a team player and be calm about it. Vettel simply put his own interests ahead of the team. That's all there is to this. Anyone who thinks differently is just not thinking.
I just fail to see bhallg2K's point, he gets personal and forgets the whole context and sounds pretty naive despite knowing better.GrizzleBoy wrote:If that is your reply, then I can't see how you've read what he posted.FrukostScones wrote: why, just because VET acted like Senna and some can't handle that.
Why can't people carry the generally light hearted behaviour from live chat into the forums?
This is something that a lot of folks aren't understanding at this point that gives more motive for Vettel for passing and Mark for being extremely pissed:Raptor22 wrote:you don;t deserve want yo haven't earned and Webber has no earned a shot at the WDC title yet. He has not been able to follow through. He's a choker
True, but that doesnt mean he didnt had a shot at it. As a matter of fact he was in the WDC race but lost it in the last race of the season. He might had lost it, but he certainly had his shot at it.Juzh wrote:You mean the year in which vettel was forced to relinquish his assured victory due to car failures in bahrain, australia and korea trough no fault of his own?wesley123 wrote:He had quite the shot at it in 2010Raptor22 wrote:you don;t deserve want yo haven't earned and Webber has no earned a shot at the WDC title yet. He has not been able to follow through. He's a choker
Mark slamming it into the wall in damp conditions in Korea ultimately lost him the championship. No excuses here.
What Vettel did was put a torpedo in his chances of Webber helping later in the season. If Vettel needs Webber to hold someone up or get out of the way in order to secure the title he'll find Webber's radio isn't working all of a sudden.RB7ate9 wrote: What Vettel essentially did was put the first torpedo into Webber's chances of fighting for the WDC.
I will have the audacity to claim an opposing opinion here. While the esteemed owner and admin is right about the basic thing that happened in the Malaysian GP today I think he is wrong about people's need to digest this by making all kind of comparisons and chat about it. Dear Tomba, we are still thinking despite your opinion to the contrary and I for myself am not inclined to shut up when I'm being told.Tomba wrote:... Vettel simply put his own interests ahead of the team. That's all there is to this. Anyone who thinks differently is just not thinking.