Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Were Red Bull and Mercedes right to impose team orders?

Merc should have Nico let pass Lewis
74
34%
Team order at Merc was the right thing to do
28
13%
Red Bull should not have issued a team order at this stage of the season
59
27%
The team order at Red Bull was justified
46
21%
I don't care or don't have an opinion about this issue
12
5%
 
Total votes: 219

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

FoxHound wrote:
Stradivarius wrote: I believe it is quite evident that this theory is not based on knowing the fuel load, but rather the fact that Rosberg was given the order to hold position, not to save fuel. Further, I find it likely that if Rosberg had been told he needed to slow down in order to conserve fuel, or else he wouldn't be able to finish the race, he would be more likely to accept and follow the order immediately. The only reason I can find not to tell Rosberg that he needed to save fuel, is that it wasn't the case.
Are you sure?

Sure enough to come to a conclusion that Mercedes where somehow protecting Hamilton from a resurgent Rosberg, and it had nothing to do with fuel for both drivers?
Mercedes had concerns about the fuel consumption of both drivers and asked them to save fuel in the second half of the race, Hamliton’s being the more critical.
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2013/03/h ... am-orders/

"Had I not acted, the both driver's would have run out of fuel."

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 02387.html


So the real facts are that Rosberg was told to conserve fuel, by holding position. James Allen and AMuS agree, and whilst neither are infallible, they get it right more times than not.
I have not claimed to be sure of anything, I simply questioned why Rosberg was told to stay behind Hamilton instead of being told to save fuel. Given that the first quote you provide here is true, we now know the answer. Hamilton was more critical on fuel than Rosberg and was thus given 3rd place by the team.

The second quote is just idiotic, as there is no actual reason why Rosberg should have to save the same amount of fuel if he did in fact have more fuel left than Hamilton.

If you imagine that two drivers from different teams were fighting each other, both being marginal on fuel, but one more critical than the other, there is no doubt that things would play out in favour of the one with more fuel on board. There is also no doubt that both teams would make sure that they made it to the end, spending as much of the fuel they had onboard as possible. As long as Rosberg stayed behind Hamilton, there is no reason he would spend any more fuel than him. But by attacking Hamilton, he could force Hamilton to spend more fuel than his fuel saving program would allow in the long run, and ultimately, Hamilton would have to stop fighting for position in order to make it to the end and this would happen before Rosberg was forced to do the same. Alternatively, Rosberg could just have saved as much fuel as Hamilton for some laps until he no longer needed to be careful with the fuel consumption, which would have happened to him before it happened to Hamilton.

Let me give an example with specific numbers: Let's assume the car needs 3 kg of fuel to go flat out for one lap. Let's further assume that Hamilton had only 28 kg of fuel left with 10 laps to go, while Rosberg had 29 kg of fuel left. They would both run out of fuel if they went flat out figting for position until the end. But by running in fuel saving mode, Hamilton could manage to spend only 2.8 kg of fuel per lap. In that case, Rosberg could simply have stayed behind Hamilton, also spending 2.8 kg of fuel per lap for the next 5 laps. He would then have 29 kg - 5 * 2.8 kg = 15 kg of fuel left, and 5 laps to go. Hamilton would have 14 kg of fuel left and would still be required to save fuel, 0.2 kg per lap, while Rosberg would have 5 laps at the end being able to go flat out.

These numbers are only examples to illustrate the point: If Hamilton was more critical on fuel than Rosberg, he would have lost 3rd place to Rosberg without the Mercedes team order, either by running out of fuel, or be having to stop fighting. I am not claiming that Hamilton is being favoured systematically, he may have gotten this advantage simply because he happened to be in front close to the end of the race. But on this occation, Rosberg first had the disadvantage (as pointed out by raymondu999) of either running heavier than Hamilton at the start, or spending less fuel at the start. Then he had the disadvantage again at the end, being denied to pass Hamilton.

User avatar
FrukostScones
163
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

richard_leeds wrote:I think the peril of forum debates is that they polarise things. Reality is likely to be much more pragmatic and have multiple factors in the decision making.

The prime objective in both RB and Merc's case was banking the points and bringing the cars home in formation. That's worth more than its weight in gold considering this team's recent history. No just one lucky car, but both in information. That team and their fans - steer well clear of "fans" apparently they're very strange creatures with a distorted sense of reality, they can render a sane person into a gibbering wreck ..... where was I? Oh yes... The team would do anything to finish up front in formation, which is why they gave the order to hold position.

The normal convention in F1 is that teams safeguard their positions towards the end of a race the focus is on bringing the car home towards the end of the race. There are no points to be gained in closing the gap to the car in front. We just need to ref Hamilton in Monza 2009 to realise the futility of letting speed distract from strategy.

To be honest I think we were spoilt by McLaren letting Hamilton and Button race side by side. That's an exception and often an error (Vettel & Webber in Turkey 2010).

So lets be pragmatic please.

..

.

To be explicit - Bickering over fuel loads, tyre life and "its a lie" and Multi 21 isn't getting this conversation anywhere. It was a pragmatic call by both teams to bank the points. Live with it.
that was the case with Force India in Melbourne which is clearly understandable, because neither driver wil challenge for the WDC 8and they both are keen to crashing)

If you want that the top drivers ride the points home for their teams then WDC is pointless. only WCC would be fair and no "fan(boy)" could cry. bloody good formula that would be.

If the people here say that Rosberg does not know what he is talking about than what.. shall I believe them. If Rosberg is not d'accord with his team bosses statement that he was low on fuel so what, they were lying to appease the puplic and do some damage limitation. When people come up with absolutely non-logical stories here just to support their agenda is mind blowing.

In the case of HAM and ROS it was clear team order to favor HAM, to give him better WDC chances. ROS WDC chances were sacrificed. HAM is now the only one that challenges for the WDC in this team. It was a cheap shot and will hopefully not pay out.
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

f1_junkie
f1_junkie
-1
Joined: 17 Oct 2012, 17:27

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

"HAM is now the only one that challenges for the WDC in this team. It was a cheap shot and will hopefully not pay out."

Sorry from this off topic post..

Not sure why, but you sound more like either a disgruntled NICO fan or HAM hater :?

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

I don't think Hamilton is the only WDC challenger at Mercedes. The team order probably favoured him only because he happened to be in front when it was clear that 3rd and 4th was the best they could hope for anyway.

Actually, it is not easy to compare them and determine who is strongest. Both qualifying sessions and practise sessions have been affected by rain, which makes it difficult to judge the driver performance. Rosberg was faster than Hamilton in Q1 and Q2 both in Australia and Malaysia, but he was beaten by Hamilton in Q3 both times. Rosberg was on Hamilton's pace in Australia until he retired and in Malaysia there is nothing that suggests Rosberg was slower. So I don't think Mercedes has ruled him out as a WDC challenger. On the other hand, I think it is too soon to say that Mercedes will be good enough to fight for the title this year. Last year they showed promising form in the beginning of the season, but were nowhere near fighting for the titles.

mnmracer
mnmracer
-26
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 23:41

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

Not worth creating a topic for, but I thought this was interesting:
Kimi interview (English Translated) by Sport Bild magazine in Germany.
https://twitter.com/kimifanpage/status/ ... 4297378816
...
SB: He (Seb) is still being critized for ignoring team-orders in Malaysia. How would you have acted if the team told you to stay behind your slower teammate?
KR:''Always you journalists with your would-if-questions! Team-orders are a part of Formula One. Sometimes you stick to it, sometimes it doesn't make sense. Team-orders can be that your engineer tells you to do this or that, but you wanted to do it the other way round. Then I won't listen to my engineer and do what I want.''

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: Poll on 2013 Malaysian GP team orders

Post

Pure Kimi, and exactly the reason why Red Bull won't sign him IMO.
JET set