Scuderia Ferrari 2013

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Points are lost and that's a fact, regardless of the circumstances - at the end of the season when you draw the line nobody cares if you have had debris or stuck DRS actuator.
While luck has always been a factor not just in motorpsort (what a revelation, I know!) SF guys have to make sure to get the strategy right from now on.

User avatar
Pilatus
22
Joined: 20 Apr 2013, 13:27

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

radosav wrote:
beelsebob wrote:
bhallg2k wrote:It's funny. The team had a awful car last year, but ran it to perfection with great strategy and flawless execution. Now the team has a great car, and they can't seem to do much of anything with it without tripping over themselves in the process.

Like the failure to stop for a new wing after the first lap in Malaysia, I don't understand why they tried to use DRS after it broke, especially so soon. It's easy to say they couldn't know just how broken it was at the time, but a very simple risk/reward analysis reveals that time gained with a functional DRS pales in comparison to time lost in the pits to fix it...again.

Avarice is a bitch, I guess.
Agreed, the sane thing to do would have been to tell Fred to open it out of the last corner just before his next pit stop, that way, if it breaks, you fix it immediately and lose nothing.
As someone mentioned on F138 thread, he would have to be within 1 sec of car in front of him, so...
And there is no DRS activation zone between last corner and pit lane entry.

StrikeForceF1
StrikeForceF1
0
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 14:24

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

bhallg2k wrote:It's funny. The team had a awful car last year, but ran it to perfection with great strategy and flawless execution. Now the team has a great car, and they can't seem to do much of anything with it without tripping over themselves in the process.

Like the failure to stop for a new wing after the first lap in Malaysia, I don't understand why they tried to use DRS after it broke, especially so soon. It's easy to say they couldn't know just how broken it was at the time, but a very simple risk/reward analysis reveals that time gained with a functional DRS pales in comparison to time lost in the pits to fix it...again.

Avarice is a bitch, I guess.
Hi Bhallg2k....Agreed, the one thing I would say is that had they finished 5th or 6th without use of Drs and than on the last lap or on the slowing down lap they ask Nando to try the Drs and it worked....wouldn't they have got more critiscism for that? Shouldn't they have than checked earlier to see if the Drs flap was working and fight for higher positions? Agreed they could've than done that check just on his in lap for his next scheduled stop,it was a coin toss, a risk taken that didn't work out. Hindsight is 20-20 vision.

Anyway my heart bleeds for the points lost, I have not followed all the lap times and the coverage I get is very poor so I don't know what the relative pace of Nando was compared to Vettel, if there were no problems could he have won the race? or was a second place there for the taking at least. Missed opportunity it was indeed.

On the bright side of things the good thing is come each race weekend, no matter the circuit Ferrari and Nando this year have a car capable of competing at the front and if not for a race victory every weekend, they can at least every weekend fight for the podium, the pace is there, the baseline is good and the qualy pace is not the best but is there or there abouts, Tyre wear is good, the balance seems good, the straight line pace is there despite carrying the needed downforce for the corners, the starts are brilliant.

The championship is not over and they can fight for it but they have to fight very hard from here on in. Nando is capable of it and in 2010 they proved it coming from behind. Last year alot of time and resource went in getting the F2012 up near to speed and making the car drivable, this year the car is good and they can focus that time and resource on developement.

Btw are Ferrari planning a big update as all other teams will be bringing big updates, is it on the schedule for next Gp?

Thanks

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

I look at it like this: Alonso lost the 2010 World Championship by four points, and he lost the 2012 World Championship by three points. Assuming a ~20 second delta for pitstops, the team's tactical errors this season have cost him as much as ten points in Malaysia and anywhere from six to 11 points in Bahrain. These kinds of (unnecessary) losses hurt in the long run. (Just ask Chris Dyer.)

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Yes, but last year they have a little bit shitty car. This year when everything will goes right, he will have better Q place and will end higher than last year. The chance for winning WDC is higher. Other teams will have problems too.
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Mr.G wrote:Yes, but last year they have a little bit shitty car. This year when everything will goes right, he will have better Q place and will end higher than last year. The chance for winning WDC is higher. Other teams will have problems too.
You can't rely on that. As a team, you have to assume that the others never make mistakes. That way you can only win it by being simply better then the others.

Just look at mclaren last year.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

I don't relay on that, hove ever that's my hope :D
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

User avatar
Forghieri
4
Joined: 15 Dec 2012, 18:08

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

The grand old man would say: " There is neither luck nor ill fortune; bad luck is what we didn't know or couldn't forsee, and good luck is what we planned ".
Do you feel you can beat the Red Bulls, either to pole position or the race itself?
Fernando Alonso: "I prefer to beat them on Sunday."

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Forghieri wrote:The grand old man would say: " There is neither luck nor ill fortune; bad luck is what we didn't know or couldn't forsee, and good luck is what we planned ".
He's wrong – good luck is also what we didn't know or couldn't foresee, it just happens that it helped you, rather than hindered you.

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Bhall, it is not just greed (although there might be some of it), also math. Last year they could only fight for 4th, 3rd, maybe 2nd sometimes. This year the Ferrari is up to a potential win in every race, and the point bonus for the win is huge, hence justifying larger risks to try and get there.
In Malaysia (I would have stopped him), calling him in in lap 1 would have allowed Alonso to claim 10 - 12 points. He got 0, but if the gamble had paid off, he might have gotten 18 or 25.
In the last race in Bahrain, Alonso finished 8th with 4 points. Had they gone conservative and not tried to use DRS after the first stop, take 20 seconds of his finishing time, and he finishes 3rd or 4th, that's 15 or 12 points. With the risk they took, had DRS worked and allowed him to a) be faster and b) able to clear traffic, 2nd would have been the normal result and 1st reachable, that's 18 or 25 points again.
As it worked out, in both cases the gamble cost Alonso about 10 points over the conservative option, but, had it worked, it would have paid 10 points extra.
I say they got unlucky, not greedy, and that having the 25 points in sight changes the risk-reward assessment. Also don't forget that getting those 25 often would mean Vettel getting 7 points less.
In most cases, the majority is below the average.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

With the potential to fight for a win every race, you tip your cap to the Racing Gods when they say, "but, not this weekend," and you go get 'em next time.

Trying to race without a front wing and then with a DRS malfunction that was repaired with a closed fist are what you do when you don't think you'll ever be that close again.

...methinks.

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Rumor: James Allison closing in on move to Ferrari, according to Autosport.

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

Assuming Allison does come on board, that will be a good move for Ferrari. He has experience with the team and is undoubtedly very strong technically. IMHO, there is one genius in F1 design -- Newey. IMO, the only way to beat him is with a technical team built on multiple strong engineers. Mercedes is taking that approach and it MIGHT be starting to pay off.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

Neno
Neno
-29
Joined: 31 May 2010, 01:41

Re: Scuderia Ferrari 2013

Post

donskar wrote:Assuming Allison does come on board, that will be a good move for Ferrari. He has experience with the team and is undoubtedly very strong technically. IMHO, there is one genius in F1 design -- Newey. IMO, the only way to beat him is with a technical team built on multiple strong engineers. Mercedes is taking that approach and it MIGHT be starting to pay off.
he already was in ferrari for money, and leaved later because he was not recognized there, or not accepted as he thinked he would, and if he is going again i can't realy imagine why =P~