godlameroso wrote:I use the same methods all the top meteorological researchers use here in the good ol' USA.
And there's your problem. The texan met forecasters once took the piss out of the UK's met office for using a supercomputer 20 times more powerful than theirs to make a forecast that was 1/7th of the distance into the future that the texans were predicting. All in all 140 times "worse" forecasting ability. The UK met office responded by asking the texans to try producing a forecast for a small area of the UK 2 hours into the future. They could not do this.
Weather patterns in north western Europe are
far more complex than the patterns found in america.
I do a lot of validation work with the meteorology department in the university where NOAA is headquartered. I'm not a meteorologist by trade, but I've worked with the staff and faculty long enough to learn a couple things.
I don't doubt that you have a lot of experience in making forecasts. What I doubt is that you can make a more accurate forecast than the professional meteorologists at the various weather offices throughout Europe. These guys do this day in day out all year round and have far more resources to devote to the task of making an accurate forecast than you, and yet they still do not think they can make an accurate forecast for this region even a couple of days ahead of schedule, let alone more than a week.