why no variable valve technology?

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Lycoming
Lycoming
106
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 22:58

Re: why no variable valve technology?

Post

Because:

1. Bernie does what he wants.

2. You could argue that the v6 turbo formula is more "road relevant" and more "environmentally friendly", which is probably beneficial for their image. And it's all just a marketing excercise anyways, so that's what really matters.

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: why no variable valve technology?

Post

On top of that, shaking up rules every few years is good for the sport. Jumbles up the running order. Be it engine, aero, chassis.. same end result.

But a boosted UHP engine and super strung out naturally aspirated UHP engine... I don't think either are particularly road relevant. How many consumer cars (petrol driven) even use turbos? I'd guess more are NA than turbo or supercharged.

Earlier comment on running pump gas, I don't see what advantage that is.. other than having to redesign or retune engine components and lose power.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

User avatar
Holm86
249
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: why no variable valve technology?

Post

Jersey Tom wrote:On top of that, shaking up rules every few years is good for the sport. Jumbles up the running order. Be it engine, aero, chassis.. same end result.

But a boosted UHP engine and super strung out naturally aspirated UHP engine... I don't think either are particularly road relevant. How many consumer cars (petrol driven) even use turbos? I'd guess more are NA than turbo or supercharged.

Earlier comment on running pump gas, I don't see what advantage that is.. other than having to redesign or retune engine components and lose power.
Almost every new car on the market today gets downsized turbo engines with direct injection. At least in europe.

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: why no variable valve technology?

Post

Holm86 wrote:
Jersey Tom wrote:On top of that, shaking up rules every few years is good for the sport. Jumbles up the running order. Be it engine, aero, chassis.. same end result.

But a boosted UHP engine and super strung out naturally aspirated UHP engine... I don't think either are particularly road relevant. How many consumer cars (petrol driven) even use turbos? I'd guess more are NA than turbo or supercharged.

Earlier comment on running pump gas, I don't see what advantage that is.. other than having to redesign or retune engine components and lose power.
Almost every new car on the market today gets downsized turbo engines with direct injection. At least in europe.
Certainly not the case in the States.

Either way, I don't see how making race engines makes for better car engines. Just like making race tires doesn't make for better car tires. Etc.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.