pRo wrote:
I rarely answer posts that involve calling names...
I'm not calling anyone any names.
pRo wrote:...but I won't ever agree that Schumi is the greatest in the history of motorsport. He isn't. In my opinion.
I never said he was. What I disagreed with pRo was your denial up to this point to accept that Schumi is
one of the greatest drivers ever to sit in a racing car and accept what an amazing brain the man has. I didn't particularly like Ayrton Senna when he was alive but still accept what an amazing racing driver he was and can easily accept that he is
one of the greatest racers ever to grace a cockpit.
pRo wrote:One of the greatest? Sure.
That's more like it.
pRo wrote:I still don't think that you need to call me names just because I don't understand everything.
That's not me calling you names. This started because...
jwielage wrote:he is certainly the most prominant driver in motor sports history.
to which you replied...
pRo wrote:You do know that the motorsports history goes beyond 90's and it's not all done on four wheels?
I'm waiting to hear your thoughts why you think Schumi was more prominent than Agostini..
This was then explained to you by Kilcoo316
kilcoo316 wrote:Because with the proliferation of TV, motorsports is seen by more people than ever before. That is is why Schumacher is more prominent than any that have gone before... even Senna and Prost did not get the TV time Schumacher has.
You then found the meaning for prominent...
Google dictionary wrote:S: (adj) outstanding, prominent, salient, spectacular, striking (having a quality that thrusts itself into attention)
...before going about disagreeing with it.
pRo wrote:i suppose you mean something else with the word then?
I think that anyone is a bit silly in not accepting that Schumi is one of the greatest, just as they would be if they denied that Senna was one of the greatest. Maybe a poor understanding of English has led us to this point, but your reply to jwielage in particular was ultimately a bit of a piss take for no reason IMO.