turning it off will have a better effect. I would bet f1 hasn't gained any fans this year (with the double points crap and now engines)bhallg2k wrote:Works for me.
"A little rebellion now and then is a good thing."
turning it off will have a better effect. I would bet f1 hasn't gained any fans this year (with the double points crap and now engines)bhallg2k wrote:Works for me.
"A little rebellion now and then is a good thing."
This is true. Better efficiency = less noise. Though I suspect we will have more noise during qualifying in the future at least. When the engines get more reliable teams will start to go to the 15.000 rpm limit instead of just 11-12.000 rpm. And during qualifying the 100kg rule does not exist so teams can dump fuel into the exhaust to get higher turbo compounding values.bhallg2k wrote:You guys ain't heard nothin' yet. Engines will only get quieter over the next few years as they're developed more and more toward better efficiency.
Sounds good, right?
True, but acoustic engineering (AKA 'stick a trumpet on it'?) is simple compared to Y250 vortice control, for instance. I'd expect an 'artificial' solution to this issue.Holm86 wrote:Better efficiency = less noise.
How is going to happen with the fuel flow rule still valid in qualifying? 27.8 g/s maximum fuel flow is still in effect. No excess rpm will change the capping at 10.500 rpm. Injecting higher flow into the exhaust is as illegal as injecting into any other position.Holm86 wrote:..I suspect we will have more noise during qualifying in the future at least. When the engines get more reliable teams will start to go to the 15.000 rpm limit instead of just 11-12.000 rpm. And during qualifying the 100kg rule does not exist so teams can dump fuel into the exhaust to get higher turbo compounding values.
In a race you only use fuel when on throttle not to breach the 100kg maximum fuel load regulations. In qualifying you could in theory inject 27.77 g/s into the engine constantly just not ignite it. It would then ignite in the exhaust and drive the turbine. This would create some bangs and pops.WhiteBlue wrote:How is going to happen with the fuel flow rule still valid in qualifying? 27.8 g/s maximum fuel flow is still in effect. No excess rpm will change the capping at 10.500 rpm. Injecting higher flow into the exhaust is as illegal as injecting into any other position.Holm86 wrote:..I suspect we will have more noise during qualifying in the future at least. When the engines get more reliable teams will start to go to the 15.000 rpm limit instead of just 11-12.000 rpm. And during qualifying the 100kg rule does not exist so teams can dump fuel into the exhaust to get higher turbo compounding values.
Though it won't change that compared to last year they are now harvesting ~90KW of exhaust energy, That energy usedxpensive wrote:What they need to do is to revise the fuel-flow mapping, so that you need to reach 13 kRpm to get the full 27.8 g/s.
That should make the engines more peaky and alter the sound-image from the current drone, with the same top-power.
The biggest problem is with loudness.SectorOne wrote:Sounds like putting make-up on a pig. It´s still a pig at the end of the day meaning i have a lot of doubt an exhaust fix is going to make people move on from the V8 sound.
I think time solves things like it usually does. When V12´s was out people complained, When V10´s was finished people complained, when V8´s is gone people complain. If it´s not one thing it´s another but eventually everyone realizes that it´s now just a memory like the rest.