Agreed.beelsebob wrote:There's no good argument to be made that Ricciardo is in any way the second coming of Christ.
Although I think he's got Talent.
Disagree.Instead, the question that should be asked if Ricciardo manages to beat Vettel is simply "wow, how good were those RedBulls, and how bad had webber got?"
It might not be that simplistic. I don't think Webber was really a bad Driver.
The behaviour of the EBD RB's probably perfectly matched Vettel's style and allowed him to extract possibly more from that car than any other Driver might have been able to.
I wouldn't have been surprised if he had bettered Alonso if both were driving an EBD RB.
But he seems to struggle more than, say Alonso if the car is not perfect.
Mark Webber was more of an Allrounder. Able to drive a mediocre car well (when the EBD wasn't working right initially on the RB8 he could deal with that better than Vettel) but not able to exploit the capabilities of the old RB's. I rate Alonso as the best of the Allrounders - by a margin.
In a top car with copius grip on the other Hand he might be slightly slower than Vettel or Hamilton at least over one lap. In raw Speed in a perfect machine, suiting their style I still rate Hamilton and Vettel as the best. That said, Hamilton seems to be able to deal with a mediocre car better than Vettel. But still not as good as Alonso. The latter is the real master of getting Points out of a so-so car.
From my point of view it is not so easy to nominate the best Driver. They all have their strengths and weaknesses. It's the combination of these with the properties of the car that leads ro a certain result.
My conclusion: Vettel is not good in driving around weaknesses of a car but he seems to bet excellent in getting the max out of a stable and predictable car.