Post MrE

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Post MrE

Post

Rumor has it that the France family is buying F1 lock stock and barrel
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Post MrE

Post

Who are "the France family"?
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Emerson.F
Emerson.F
20
Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 22:25
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Post MrE

Post

Yes source please.. Jeesh
Supporting: Ham/Alo/Kimi/Ros/Seb/Hulk/Ric/Mag

lebesset
lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

Re: Post MrE

Post

rich but not that rich , nascar is not what it was either
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

User avatar
MOWOG
24
Joined: 07 Apr 2013, 15:46
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Re: Post MrE

Post

the France family is buying F1 lock stock and barrel
Ah. So that explains the Gene Haas boondoggle, I guess. :twisted:

Formula One will be a lot more interesting with push rod V-8 engines and carburetors. Maybe restrictor plates for Monza and Suzuka? :lol:
Some men go crazy; some men go slow. Some men go just where they want; some men never go.

User avatar
Pebblestone
0
Joined: 04 Feb 2014, 03:37
Location: Montreal

Re: Post MrE

Post

If anything... it could just be Bernie Ecclestone selling to Bernard Ecclestone to avoid a UK tax dodge scandal #-o
The ingredients for the recipe of success shall be added in the following order: Attitude, Aptitude and Altitude. Inversions to the prescribe order could seriously prevent altitude from happening, therefore giving a sour taste to the mix.

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Post MrE

Post

It seems at the moment the BBC have it in for him (judging by the Panorama program the other day which was very biased). Maybe some form of payback over the whole tv deal thing. For example they kept referring to the Constantin court case, but not once did they mention he actually won that.

Its interesting over this whole tax dodge thing, because HMRC investigated him over a number of years and agreed a settlement of £10M.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Post MrE

Post

astracrazy wrote:It seems at the moment the BBC have it in for him (judging by the Panorama program the other day which was very biased). Maybe some form of payback over the whole tv deal thing. For example they kept referring to the Constantin court case, but not once did they mention he actually won that.

Its interesting over this whole tax dodge thing, because HMRC investigated him over a number of years and agreed a settlement of £10M.
Of note, at that court case the judge did assert that they were absolutely certain that Bernie had payed a bribe. He didn't so much prove that he was innocent, instead, his opposition couldn't prove that they actually lost anything because of his guilt.

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Post MrE

Post

beelsebob wrote:
astracrazy wrote:It seems at the moment the BBC have it in for him (judging by the Panorama program the other day which was very biased). Maybe some form of payback over the whole tv deal thing. For example they kept referring to the Constantin court case, but not once did they mention he actually won that.

Its interesting over this whole tax dodge thing, because HMRC investigated him over a number of years and agreed a settlement of £10M.
Of note, at that court case the judge did assert that they were absolutely certain that Bernie had payed a bribe. He didn't so much prove that he was innocent, instead, his opposition couldn't prove that they actually lost anything because of his guilt.
ye i know what your saying, i was just using that as an example of things not mentioned. The actual program used some unrealistic scenarios to put him in a negative light.

User avatar
MOWOG
24
Joined: 07 Apr 2013, 15:46
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Re: Post MrE

Post

Courts do not find people to be innocent. They find them "not guilty". There is a world of difference between the two. :wink:
Some men go crazy; some men go slow. Some men go just where they want; some men never go.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Post MrE

Post

Actually civil courts weigh up probabilities and give narrative judgements. As I recall the court did find for the plaintiff on just about every matter of what happened, but they found the plaintiff failed to prove financial loss. As opposed to the criminal courts binary system of guilt or not.

User avatar
MOWOG
24
Joined: 07 Apr 2013, 15:46
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Re: Post MrE

Post

I was of course referring to criminal courts. The words "innocent" and "not guilty" are irrelevant in civil proceedings.
Some men go crazy; some men go slow. Some men go just where they want; some men never go.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Post MrE

Post

I think it's testament to Bernie's ingenuity that even though the deal was declared to be corrupt and he was found to be a deceptive witness who lied in court, the money trail was too complex to establish any losses.

lebesset
lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

Re: Post MrE

Post

richard_leeds wrote:I think it's testament to Bernie's ingenuity that even though the deal was declared to be corrupt and he was found to be a deceptive witness who lied in court, the money trail was too complex to establish any losses.
I think bernie missed his calling in life
if he had been in the finance industry he would have made some SERIOUS money
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Post MrE

Post

what more than the billions he has now? The trust fund alone earns £10M every few weeks in interest alone. To put his current earnings in perspective - he reckons he pays about £50M a year in tax.

You have to give him credit, HMRC investigated him for 9 years and couldn't put anything on him apart from agreeing to a £10M settlement. Look above what I wrote about interest to see thats nothing to him