It's not even uni cloth; they're getting the carbon as tows on a spool, which is pretty much as it comes off the production line. They're stitchingg it into preforms themselves. Somewhat unusual in automotive industry, where it seems everybody is most used to prepreg cloth, but this isn't unusual in aerospace.Cold Fussion wrote:Forgive, but what is so special about this? Isn't most carbon cloth unidirectional?WhiteBlue wrote: Perhaps you have noticed that BMW uses practically unidirectional fabric for the preforms. They use very small sections in order to align the fibre direction with the predominant direction of the stresses.
Though, if you think uni cloth/prepreg is unusual, you clearly don't know much about fibre composites.
You could do that with prepreg too. For small volume, it's faster overall with prepreg since it takes a lot of time and money to set up the machine to stitch the preforms, but obviously this isn't small volume.WhiteBlue wrote:The BMW look is very different when you inspect the naked crash cell.
http://www.bmwblog.com/wp-content/uploa ... 55x491.jpg
If you follow the pattern all around the huge side frame around the two door cut outs you realise that they have at least 15-20 3D-layup sections of predominantly unidirectional fabric used only for this part.
I should also add that the nylon thread they use to stitch the preforms add basically nothing to the mechanical performance of the part, but do contribute 1-2% of the final part weight.
HUGE push. Hear much more about it then prepreg work these days. Autoclaves are usually your bottleneck, but installing more is extremely expensive, especially for aerospace sized 'claves. The really big ones need to be designed into the building itself.flynfrog wrote:Not everything on an airplane goes through an autoclave. There has been a big push in recent years to go out of autoclave.
As am I.flynfrog wrote:I am curious what the void content is with this fast of the shot. They must be using some monster vacuum pumps.
Ok.WhiteBlue wrote: I'm not going to split hairs with you. So this point is done for me. BMW uses renewables. Other brands don't. I can't even see a claim that another manufacturer tries to generate the energy for making his body shell material by renewables. Because BMW does it is irrelevant for the carbon foot print and the eco balance how much energy they use. It is green energy.
But would it be more green if they used a less energy intensive process to produce their cars and allowed the hydro energy they save to go into offsetting energy production from a coal plant? Obviously that's not easy to answer, but it's just something to think about.