Cold Fussion wrote:Close to 600 Hp.alemos24 wrote:So , in the end how much HP have these cars ?
Someone says that the ice could produces 690 Hp + 160 Ers .
600 hp is what cosworth speculated that it could produce
Cold Fussion wrote:Close to 600 Hp.alemos24 wrote:So , in the end how much HP have these cars ?
Someone says that the ice could produces 690 Hp + 160 Ers .
Where have you pulled that figure from?ringo wrote:The most these engines make is 620 bhp.
So you're saying that because you calculated something based on a bunch of assumptions about the fuel, and the engine, it's impossible that no one has done something better?ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
I've seen his figures, he has a good engine spread sheet that you can change the inputs on. He's probably not far off. I'm normally one of the first to call Ringo out on his claims, but he's got this one about right.beelsebob wrote:So you're saying that because you calculated something based on a bunch of assumptions about the fuel, and the engine, it's impossible that no one has done something better?ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
How about instead of calculating using your 13.6 fuel:air ratio try calculating it using the stoichiometric figure of 14.7 to one and see what it comes out.ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
• The result is "only" 667 bhpgruntguru wrote:Mercedes claim thermal efficiency "above 40%". For 100kg/hr of fuel with a HV of 45 Mj/kg 40% TE gives 500 kW or 667 hp. Unfortunately Mercedes did not specify whether the 40% included electricity harvested by the MGUH.
That's an extremely conservative estimate of the energy density of the fuel. Even fuel for road going cars typically exceeds this.WilliamsF1 wrote:Where did 45 Mj/kg come from?
Not really, pump gas is typically 43- 46 MJ/kg, while nobody knows what Shell and Total has cooked up for this F1 season.beelsebob wrote:That's an extremely conservative estimate of the energy density of the fuel. Even fuel for road going cars typically exceeds this.WilliamsF1 wrote:Where did 45 Mj/kg come from?
The 667hp figure could be:beelsebob wrote:• The result is "only" 667 bhpgruntguru wrote:Mercedes claim thermal efficiency "above 40%". For 100kg/hr of fuel with a HV of 45 Mj/kg 40% TE gives 500 kW or 667 hp. Unfortunately Mercedes did not specify whether the 40% included electricity harvested by the MGUH.
• we know that you get 160 hp from the ERS system
• we know that the other teams are around the 600 bhp area for their ICE alone
• we know that Mercedes is almost as fast with ICE only as the other teams with ICE and ERS.
Given all these 4 facts, I find it highly unlikely that the Merc ICE is around the 507hb mark. The idea that Mercedes found an extra 50hp over what Ringo thinks is possible sounds much more likely.
Note, it may even be that both ringo is right, and Merc have a more powerful ICE than that - it might be that Mercedes have found a loop hole in the engine regulations that no one has discovered yet.
That is a most resonable estimation; With 46 MJ/kg, 27.8 g/s flow and 35% efficiency you get 450 kW or 600 Hp.wuzak wrote: It is unlikely that 40% TE is achieved with the ICE only.
It is most likely that 40% TE is in turbo-compound mode. Let's say that the ICE has 600hp, and can get 70hp back from the MGUH, that would give 670hp. You would then have an additional 90hp if you also used the ES to drive the MGUK - a total of 760hp.