2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Cold Fussion wrote:
alemos24 wrote:So , in the end how much HP have these cars ?

Someone says that the ice could produces 690 Hp + 160 Ers .
Close to 600 Hp.

600 hp is what cosworth speculated that it could produce

mrluke
mrluke
33
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 20:31

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

From everything we have seen so far it is difficult to argue the cars have less power than last year. It is also apparent that the Renault PU needs a recharge lap, its unusual for them to do two flying laps in qualy in a row (this might have changed with latest updates?).

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

The most these engines make is 620 bhp. The ERS will add 160.
So that's 780hp.
The reason these cars seem fast is the low drag setup, the advantage to be had from gearing with the wide power band. But otherwise they look much slower on track to me.

Hamilton has repeatedly said that the car has more power, but I feel it's the pull that he's getting from the electric torque and the turbo engine.
For Sure!!

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

ringo wrote:The most these engines make is 620 bhp.
Where have you pulled that figure from?

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
For Sure!!

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
So you're saying that because you calculated something based on a bunch of assumptions about the fuel, and the engine, it's impossible that no one has done something better?

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

beelsebob wrote:
ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
So you're saying that because you calculated something based on a bunch of assumptions about the fuel, and the engine, it's impossible that no one has done something better?
I've seen his figures, he has a good engine spread sheet that you can change the inputs on. He's probably not far off. I'm normally one of the first to call Ringo out on his claims, but he's got this one about right.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

trinidefender
trinidefender
317
Joined: 19 Apr 2013, 20:37

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

ringo wrote:It's what my calculations show. And try as I might I couldnt get more than that from the fuel restriction. This is with 15% mechanical losses. Some teams have said 600, some 580, so 620 is a healthy figure.
How about instead of calculating using your 13.6 fuel:air ratio try calculating it using the stoichiometric figure of 14.7 to one and see what it comes out.

gruntguru
gruntguru
566
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Mercedes claim thermal efficiency "above 40%". For 100kg/hr of fuel with a HV of 45 Mj/kg 40% TE gives 500 kW or 667 hp. Unfortunately Mercedes did not specify whether the 40% included electricity harvested by the MGUH.
je suis charlie

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

gruntguru wrote:Mercedes claim thermal efficiency "above 40%". For 100kg/hr of fuel with a HV of 45 Mj/kg 40% TE gives 500 kW or 667 hp. Unfortunately Mercedes did not specify whether the 40% included electricity harvested by the MGUH.
• The result is "only" 667 bhp
• we know that you get 160 hp from the ERS system
• we know that the other teams are around the 600 bhp area for their ICE alone
• we know that Mercedes is almost as fast with ICE only as the other teams with ICE and ERS.

Given all these 4 facts, I find it highly unlikely that the Merc ICE is around the 507hb mark. The idea that Mercedes found an extra 50hp over what Ringo thinks is possible sounds much more likely.

Note, it may even be that both ringo is right, and Merc have a more powerful ICE than that - it might be that Mercedes have found a loop hole in the engine regulations that no one has discovered yet.

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Where did 45 Mj/kg come from?

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

WilliamsF1 wrote:Where did 45 Mj/kg come from?
That's an extremely conservative estimate of the energy density of the fuel. Even fuel for road going cars typically exceeds this.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

beelsebob wrote:
WilliamsF1 wrote:Where did 45 Mj/kg come from?
That's an extremely conservative estimate of the energy density of the fuel. Even fuel for road going cars typically exceeds this.
Not really, pump gas is typically 43- 46 MJ/kg, while nobody knows what Shell and Total has cooked up for this F1 season.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

beelsebob wrote:
gruntguru wrote:Mercedes claim thermal efficiency "above 40%". For 100kg/hr of fuel with a HV of 45 Mj/kg 40% TE gives 500 kW or 667 hp. Unfortunately Mercedes did not specify whether the 40% included electricity harvested by the MGUH.
• The result is "only" 667 bhp
• we know that you get 160 hp from the ERS system
• we know that the other teams are around the 600 bhp area for their ICE alone
• we know that Mercedes is almost as fast with ICE only as the other teams with ICE and ERS.

Given all these 4 facts, I find it highly unlikely that the Merc ICE is around the 507hb mark. The idea that Mercedes found an extra 50hp over what Ringo thinks is possible sounds much more likely.

Note, it may even be that both ringo is right, and Merc have a more powerful ICE than that - it might be that Mercedes have found a loop hole in the engine regulations that no one has discovered yet.
The 667hp figure could be:
a) ICE only
b) ICE + MGUH power, or
c) ICE + MGUH + MGUK/ES power.

It is unlikely that 40% TE is achieved with the ICE only.

It is most likely that 40% TE is in turbo-compound mode. Let's say that the ICE has 600hp, and can get 70hp back from the MGUH, that would give 670hp. You would then have an additional 90hp if you also used the ES to drive the MGUK - a total of 760hp.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

wuzak wrote: It is unlikely that 40% TE is achieved with the ICE only.

It is most likely that 40% TE is in turbo-compound mode. Let's say that the ICE has 600hp, and can get 70hp back from the MGUH, that would give 670hp. You would then have an additional 90hp if you also used the ES to drive the MGUK - a total of 760hp.
That is a most resonable estimation; With 46 MJ/kg, 27.8 g/s flow and 35% efficiency you get 450 kW or 600 Hp.

MGU-K is limited to 120 kW or160 Hp, wherever the electricity is coming from, the ES or the MGU-H.

Total 760 Hp means a total efficiency of 44%

Mercedes superiority comes from a fully develop MGU-H, which gives them the whole enchillada almost everywhere.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"