With Redbull kind of money and their strong extreme sports following, they might as well just set up Formula X-1 themselves.autogyro wrote:What do you think the chances are that Adrian will surface in Formula E?
He knows where the future is.
You think they are boring or they actually bore you? Flat or not, they have enough torque to spin the wheels up to 3-4 gear, while V8s could not. My only objection is the sound, but driving wise they are much more interesting to look at.xpensive wrote:Quasi-endurance hybrids with an artificially flat powercurve are not true racing engines to my mind, they are just boring.
I guess you mean they have high mid-range power, which is xactly the artificial part I object to, all due to a constant fuel-flow.timbo wrote:...xpensive wrote:Quasi-endurance hybrids with an artificially flat powercurve are not true racing engines to my mind, they are just boring.
Flat or not, they have enough torque to spin the wheels up to 3-4 gear, while V8s could not.
...
Constant fuel flow is responsible for the flat part of the power curve, not for the high mid-range power, that´s thanks to the turbo.xpensive wrote:I guess you mean they have high mid-range power, which is xactly the artificial part I object to, all due to a constant fuel-flow.timbo wrote:...xpensive wrote:Quasi-endurance hybrids with an artificially flat powercurve are not true racing engines to my mind, they are just boring.
Flat or not, they have enough torque to spin the wheels up to 3-4 gear, while V8s could not.
...
Not unless they allow chassis development. Formula E only allows powertrain development and only after this first season.autogyro wrote:What do you think the chances are that Adrian will surface in Formula E?
He knows where the future is.
A fuel consumption limit only might be unsafe, as it does not prevent teams and the engine manufacturers to make the engines generate an incredible amount of power. Without a fuel-flow limit the current breed of engines are capable to produce around 2,000 bhp.Shrieker wrote:"You have 70 liters of fuel to work with. Bring in any engine you want."
I see nothing wrong with that. We'd not have had to suffer the sorry sound either. Even my dad (who doesn't give a s***) complained about the sound this last race... So yes, nothing wrong with F1 becoming too engine oriented - if there ever is such a thing.
Well if i was an engineer i'd design my wings that way that they stall just before speed xxx. By doing so you could achieve higher df than XXXX points below that speed but still be within the rules.Andres125sx wrote:What if they limit aero to XXXX points of downforce at XXX speed?
But it almost always were.lebesset wrote:is F1 a sport ?
if so it has to be primarily a drivers formula rather than the designers formula that it has become
But they still have MORE power at the throttle than V8s. Full throttle % decreased over the lap, and this is nice thing to see.xpensive wrote:I guess you mean they have high mid-range power, which is xactly the artificial part I object to, all due to a constant fuel-flow.