Well,.. this might be my first year to also start supporting the McLaren-Honda team with Alonso..
My number one is still Ferrari, but I really like Alonso too.
Looking very much forward to next year!
Really?!?!? RB and Merc both took 4 or 5 years to climb to the top. Yes one could argue that McLaren are starting from a stronger base but on the other hand the long established technical base might be part of the problem. They also have an engine supplier with no current F1 experience building an engine with technology they've never seen before.Kingshark wrote:McLaren are now the factory/works team of a huge manufacturer and have a real world class driver behind the wheel. There's no excuses to why they should fail in 2015.
apart from Merc who is the aim to beat is essentially 4 years ahead of them in terms of engine and chassis partnership?Kingshark wrote:McLaren are now the factory/works team of a huge manufacturer and have a real world class driver behind the wheel. There's no excuses to why they should fail in 2015.
Richard wrote:Really?!?!? RB and Merc both took 4 or 5 years to climb to the top. Yes one could argue that McLaren are starting from a stronger base but on the other hand the long established technical base might be part of the problem. They also have an engine supplier with no current F1 experience building an engine with technology they've never seen before.Kingshark wrote:McLaren are now the factory/works team of a huge manufacturer and have a real world class driver behind the wheel. There's no excuses to why they should fail in 2015.
They're also competing against teams who will have sorted out reliability and learnt how to get the best out of the PU.
Assuming McLaren don't have a trick on par with the DDD, they'll consider a few podiums a success next year. Then top 3 in year 2, shot at WDC or WCC in year 3 or 4. That assumes other teams are unable to develop a more competitive car.
Never underestimate the Japanese when it comes to electronics and battery technology. Not sure how drunk enough you have to be to say that, but all I can say is you will be surprised... you will be surprised..Richard wrote:Really?!?!? RB and Merc both took 4 or 5 years to climb to the top. Yes one could argue that McLaren are starting from a stronger base but on the other hand the long established technical base might be part of the problem. They also have an engine supplier with no current F1 experience building an engine with technology they've never seen before.Kingshark wrote:McLaren are now the factory/works team of a huge manufacturer and have a real world class driver behind the wheel. There's no excuses to why they should fail in 2015.
They're also competing against teams who will have sorted out reliability and learnt how to get the best out of the PU.
Assuming McLaren don't have a trick on par with the DDD, they'll consider a few podiums a success next year. Then top 3 in year 2, shot at WDC or WCC in year 3 or 4. That assumes other teams are unable to develop a more competitive car.
Erm, I can't really fully agree to the above.zeph wrote:Exactly. Before the testing ban it was entirely possible to come into the season with a new chassis/engine and be competitive right away, but without testing that has become very unlikely. Also, it is helpful to have 'special' relations with F1's power brokers and the FIA, something McLaren has never been particularly apt at, historically.Richard wrote:Really?!?!? RB and Merc both took 4 or 5 years to climb to the top. Yes one could argue that McLaren are starting from a stronger base but on the other hand the long established technical base might be part of the problem. They also have an engine supplier with no current F1 experience building an engine with technology they've never seen before.Kingshark wrote:McLaren are now the factory/works team of a huge manufacturer and have a real world class driver behind the wheel. There's no excuses to why they should fail in 2015.
They're also competing against teams who will have sorted out reliability and learnt how to get the best out of the PU.
Assuming McLaren don't have a trick on par with the DDD, they'll consider a few podiums a success next year. Then top 3 in year 2, shot at WDC or WCC in year 3 or 4. That assumes other teams are unable to develop a more competitive car.
While not absolutely impossible, it would be nothing short of a miracle if they were to be competitive right away.
MP4-30 + new title sponsor + new livery, all at once. That's what I think.KingHamilton01 wrote:So does anyone think McLaren Will announce a title sponsor? rumoured Movi-star were coming on board but nothing mentioned today!
Hakkinen and DC would have been in the Mclaren for longer.adrianjordan wrote:Could this make Button the longest serving Mclaren race driver by the end of his contract?
Maybe, but I think the only reason they brought those cars was because they had Honda engines. Livery is incidental.Manoah2u wrote:Will be interesting seeing the 2015 livery. The red-white cars might be a hint after all
I sure hope you are right, Alonso needs a third (and fourth) WDC pronto. It would be tragic for him to finish with only two.Manoah2u wrote:Erm, I can't really fully agree to the above.zeph wrote:Exactly. Before the testing ban it was entirely possible to come into the season with a new chassis/engine and be competitive right away, but without testing that has become very unlikely. Also, it is helpful to have 'special' relations with F1's power brokers and the FIA, something McLaren has never been particularly apt at, historically.Richard wrote: Really?!?!? RB and Merc both took 4 or 5 years to climb to the top. Yes one could argue that McLaren are starting from a stronger base but on the other hand the long established technical base might be part of the problem. They also have an engine supplier with no current F1 experience building an engine with technology they've never seen before.
They're also competing against teams who will have sorted out reliability and learnt how to get the best out of the PU.
Assuming McLaren don't have a trick on par with the DDD, they'll consider a few podiums a success next year. Then top 3 in year 2, shot at WDC or WCC in year 3 or 4. That assumes other teams are unable to develop a more competitive car.
While not absolutely impossible, it would be nothing short of a miracle if they were to be competitive right away.
..........[edited for brevity].........
If you ask me, Honda is in a very very good position to come into the party and trash the field. I'd really like to see them do that, and I'd be all smiles if they ruined the Mercedes party by winning by a mile in a 1-2.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/117114Dennis added that he believes Hamilton was a key player in the problems at McLaren escalating in 2007, rather than Alonso being solely to blame.
"To go back to that period, you look at this young guy, understandably perceived by many people as the chosen one," he said.
"But [he was] also someone who had immaturity, and really, who struck the first blow?
"I would say Lewis had his role to play in starting this process which escalated."