Was the sponsorship problem the reason or the occasion (excuse) to fire the dutch?

I understand you patriotic feeling about Narain, but he's not. Monteiro looked way more consistent than him. His name is considereb by Kolles because Spyker needs cash badly.siskue2005 wrote:Why not??modbaraban wrote:Let's hope it's not Karthikeyan![]()
IMO, he is better the Klien!
Quite right! However Johnny Herbert is quite wrong look where Alonso ended up!F1 Observer wrote: Anyway, I still think Albers is a talented driver. Just remember his breathtaking drives in the DTM...Perhaps sportscars is his thing.
But to be honest, any driver would get a bad reputation after driving for Minardi, Midland and Spyker!
![]()
Like Johnny Herbert once said : "No disrespect, but I won't drive for Minardi"
More than half of F1 drivers are there not really coz of their exceptional driving talentsmodbaraban wrote:I understand you patriotic feeling about Narain, but he's not. Monteiro looked way more consistent than him. His name is considereb by Kolles because Spyker needs cash badly.siskue2005 wrote:Why not??modbaraban wrote:Let's hope it's not Karthikeyan![]()
IMO, he is better the Klien!
Btw, Klien was the best rookie of 2004 according to F1Racing.
This statement about JB, DC and Trulli is rather doubtful to say the leastvs331 wrote:More than half of F1 drivers are there not really coz of their exceptional driving talents. JB, DC, Trulli,.. the list goes on. These are just average drivers, who sponsors also like and they make up the numbers. DC stayed that long at macca mainly coz he was sponsors' darling. IMO Karthikeyan is also one of these kind of drivers and if he can bring in the money then he deserves the drive.