Absolutely mental.
Should I be worried about collecting next months pension!
He already owns his own black hole. It is designated F1 and it swallows up a lot teams, factories, and a lot of money. In 2014 alone Caterham and Marussia disappeared into Bernie's black hole.Andres125sx wrote:A black hole with the mass of 10 billion suns!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How do we send Mr E there?
Even if we did send him into one i´m sure he will come out of it having made a deal with the black hole that it could not refuse.Andres125sx wrote:How do we send Mr E there?
They dont sell it as being the answer, science is very open that they havent yet resolved relativity vs Quantam mechanics.autogyro wrote:Unfortunately this still tells us very little about the Universe.
We cannot account for 80 percent of the mass and energy in the Universe.
Scientists have had to call this 'Dark Mass' and 'Dark Energy'.
It is the only way they can get their human created math to work.
I prefer the 'electro magnetic universe theories'.
This tends towards explaining the lost mass and energy.
Unfortunately, with all of this, few facts are involved.
Conclusions are mathematical based on the probable 'effects' of particles and energy that cannot be proven to exist.
Science is today a bit like religion hiding behind theory and conjecture.
Still they sell it well enough to gain grant money I suppose.
It depends on how you look at it. Black Holes certainly gives us a clearer view of how the universe works.autogyro wrote:Unfortunately this still tells us very little about the Universe.
96% actually, and just like inflation, it´s the best theory around so far.autogyro wrote:We cannot account for 80 percent of the mass and energy in the Universe.
While technically right it´s called Dark Matter.autogyro wrote:Scientists have had to call this 'Dark Mass' and 'Dark Energy'.
Whether math has been invented or discovered is still up for debate although i would say most mathematicians believe it´s been discovered rather then invented.autogyro wrote:It is the only way they can get their human created math to work.
Surely you have also read where the electric universe theory gets absolutely hammered by cold hard evidence?autogyro wrote:I prefer the 'electro magnetic universe theories'.
This tends towards explaining the lost mass and energy.
Expand on this please.autogyro wrote:Conclusions are mathematical based on the probable 'effects' of particles and energy that cannot be proven to exist.
Gravity is a theory. In order to have a theory you can´t just make sh*t up (like the electronic universe).autogyro wrote:Science is today a bit like religion hiding behind theory and conjecture.