indeed... just a bunch of nonsenseajnšpric_pumpa wrote:EDIT: thank god there is no rating in this tread...
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
indeed... just a bunch of nonsenseajnšpric_pumpa wrote:EDIT: thank god there is no rating in this tread...
it's not it's called to "throw a bone"Jef Patat wrote:indeed... just a bunch of nonsenseajnšpric_pumpa wrote:EDIT: thank god there is no rating in this tread...
No voting? Look what happened ....ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:it's not it's called to "throw a bone"Jef Patat wrote:indeed... just a bunch of nonsenseajnšpric_pumpa wrote:EDIT: thank god there is no rating in this tread...
I don't, Britney has proven he can't race hard unless he's being coached so imo he will flattened by Hamilton this year.n04h f1 wrote:I really hope Rosberg can win this race to make this season more interesting, especially since the Ferraris probably won't be as close to the Mercs as in Malaysia.
That was before the driver coaching ban, we'll see how good he really is this weekend.godlameroso wrote:It's going to be a damp Friday, cold cloudy but dry Saturday, and a cool but sunny Sunday. Rosberg is better than Hamilton around here, if he qualifies in front of him he can probably hold him off. Dark horse for this race will be Raikkonen, his softs will last forever, and I think he's a bit faster than Vettel.
Joking?Juzh wrote:Like when? I'm honestly curious, because the number don't add up, and FPs are not something to rely on. Just ask hamilton.ringo wrote:He seems like he can be faster than Vettel, all things going well with his setup. So far he has shown very interesting pace at some instances.spadeflush wrote:Hopefully Kimi will have an event free race. I have a feeling he is right up there with Vettel.Would love to see a close battle among them
Going by what data? 2013 and 2014 saw Lewis out qualify and outrace Rosberg in Chinagodlameroso wrote:Rosberg is better than Hamilton around here, if he qualifies in front of him he can probably hold him off
Plus Lewis has more wins here than any other driver on the grid. I think it's fair to say he's quick enough around China to win...raymondu999 wrote:Going by what data? 2013 and 2014 saw Lewis out qualify and outrace Rosberg in Chinagodlameroso wrote:Rosberg is better than Hamilton around here, if he qualifies in front of him he can probably hold him off
You just said "seemed like he could be faster" and I asked you to provide data on how you got that conclusion. Nothing so far indicated RAI is indeed faster. That's not to say he's not, because he's had a lot of bad luck and can not be objectively measured yet, but equally there's nothing to say that he is.foxmulder_ms wrote: Joking?
Have you seen the races. At least he is a match.
Eh? Rosberg has never beaten Hamilton around this track.godlameroso wrote:It's going to be a damp Friday, cold cloudy but dry Saturday, and a cool but sunny Sunday. Rosberg is better than Hamilton around here, if he qualifies in front of him he can probably hold him off. Dark horse for this race will be Raikkonen, his softs will last forever, and I think he's a bit faster than Vettel.
Eh? Yes he did..Moose wrote:Eh? Rosberg has never beaten Hamilton around this track.godlameroso wrote:It's going to be a damp Friday, cold cloudy but dry Saturday, and a cool but sunny Sunday. Rosberg is better than Hamilton around here, if he qualifies in front of him he can probably hold him off. Dark horse for this race will be Raikkonen, his softs will last forever, and I think he's a bit faster than Vettel.
In terms of Lewis vs Nico - I'm not going to accept that as an argument, because we only saw them competing in equal machinery over 2013 and 2014. But yes, Lewis in general is good in ChinaJ0rd4n wrote:Plus Lewis has more wins here than any other driver on the grid
Not as teammates, I think that's what Moose meant.George-Jung wrote:Eh? Yes he did..Moose wrote:Eh? Rosberg has never beaten Hamilton around this track.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/17718458
Fwiw Britney is his paddock nickname given to him by Mark Webber while both were at Williams.turbof1 wrote:I agree with that. I'll adjust the names later on, but posts containing the name after this will be removed. It's not an issue when it gets mentioned once or so, but it's getting quite tiresome.