WilliamsF1 wrote:Toyota has less than 520 HP, not sure they would settle for a NA engine if it is 50HP behind the turbo engines.
Porsche engine should be less powerful than Toyota as they are running lesser fuel
PS- I am only using what RaceCarEngineering had quoted
Whatever the actual number ICE number is, if the 1350 hp number is to believe then it just changes slightly how long they can use the electric motor for.
mrluke wrote:Wast the SPA 6 hours a new record distance for a 6 hour race?
That doesn't seem to match the way down on power position.
Potentially I could accept it is due to reliability but im pretty sure a new lap record was achieved and from what the commentators were saying they expect the break the lap record at every circuit this year. Again that sounds very odd if the cars are soo down on power.
Let's not forget that this years race was completely non interrupted by safety cars ( I don't think there was even a single slow zone?) so that will help a lot as well. I expect the distance record will be broken at Le Mans this year as well (baring major reliability problems or some huge accidents again). The 2009 spec cars were close to 700 hp, so for much of the straight they are down on power compared to 2009. It's important to remember though that 700 hp was traction limited for x time, while the new cars with AWD are far less traction limited and thus accelerate far more rapidly, which potentially (or does so completely) negates the average power advantage the 2009 cars have. Aerodynamics advances in 6 years as well.
mrluke wrote:But hey, lets not let reality get in the way of hating those damn evil electric hybrid cars.
This is out of line. The hybrid formula is fantastic, but that doesn't mean it's correct to think of the cars as "1300" hp as the media like to hype it, when it should be viewed as the ICE power + the hybrid class energy allocation (which they can deploy as the see best); but I guess this all stems from the non technical people not properly understanding power and energy.