data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6d40/e6d404101c05e0efb1a0ff841335cfba73433cc0" alt="Image"
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph ... 1429707898
cheating? how exactly?kooleracer wrote:How the hell can you support Ferrari when they are blatantly cheating? I mean 97 million dollars just to turn up? How the hell is that fair? Its like letting Usain bolt start 10 meters ahead of everyone in the same race...Ferrari shouldn't get any performance payout. Because they get 97 million which is already more then winning the championship.
The fans should start making a fuss about this stupid Ferrari premium because others teams that need to money are left out because the richest team in the sports wants even more money. Ferrari should be ashamed for not even able to compete with Red Bull and now with Mercedes. Getting that kind of money and even with that money they aren't even competitive. Other teams should make that point more often in the public so that the public get more aware off this stupid imbalance in the prize money distribution. I can live with the fact that Ferrari get 97 for turning up, but that fact that they also get a equal share in the performance prize money is totally not acceptable.
It would more fair if Mercedes,Ferrari,Williams, McLaren and RBR all get 97m. And the rest should be divided based on performance for the other teams I could live with that model. But richest teams are now benefiting too much.
It could so easy. Give the "big" five all 100m and divide the rest equally over the rest.
Big five get 100m and the rest gets approx 75 m and then introduce a budget cap of 150m. F1 would be much healthier and the competition would be a lot closer.
Williams only got 10 million premium though... Something else is in play I think.Richard wrote:It's a prize that rewards long term investment based on several years of results, so the 2014 classification is misleading. Ignoring Ferrari for a moment it seems about right. We'll probably see Merc swap places with RB next year, and McLaren drop below Williams.
I'd tend to agree, except for one problem with that. That would encourage teams that are not serious to turn up and race just because they'll get a cash pay out. It would need some kind of moderation along the lines of "everyone who completes a lap within 104% of the fastest at a race during the year gets a share."mrluke wrote:They should all get an equal split. End of.
Then we would have competitive new and midfield teams rather than bankrupt ones.