#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Especially the bolded Part sounds really good. ^^Quote
-The power unit is not yet mature enough in terms of technology, so definitely we are behind Ferrari and Mercedes in power terms. But still, what Honda have achieved in only two years is very impressive as we are not far from Renault.
In terms of chassis, we have a good chassis, the car is good, it's good to drive, the drivers love it. It’s even very good in slow corners but it still needs some new development.
It's a new aero concept, a new philosophy, and we've spent the first three months of the season focusing more on R&D. We have brought upgrades to every race, but we didn't bring the 'big one' because we decided to focus more time in the factory on CFD and the windtunnel, to fine-tune what we are doing. Between now and the next few races you'll see a lot of changes, so the performance should grow massively.
-Who knows, in Singapore an engineer might wake up with the magic solution to find one second of performance, then we can perhaps be on the podium and win races. We do more than our best and everyone is 100 per cent working flat-out, so let's see what happens by the summer shutdown.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Yes that's correct.Thunders wrote:There is an Autosport+ Interview with Eric Boullier, which i sadly don't have access too, but according to a Poster on the Autosport Forum this was said.... (maybe someone with Access con confirm)
Vast majority is not very specific, I wonder if packaging that was a joint effort of engine and chassis makers with all the pros and cons is included or divided from this"It is quite clear to everyone in F1 that the Honda engine is responsible for the vast majority of McLaren's performance shortfall to Mercedes."
No thoughts about McLaren, I guess unlike Honda it's the same company like in the 90s and seasons with a different engine like 2007, 2009, 2012-2014 didn't happen. As if using 90s as a benchmark for 2015 F1 and hybrid engines wasn't at best questionable."If you look across motorsport, Honda is struggling everywhere except the British Touring Car Championship, Honda does not seem to be the same company with the same racing spirit it had in the past."

A normal FP1 which taking into account Mclaren´s standards during the season its more than good. As far as I know they have new aerodinamic pieces to check so I hope they can be not so far from Q3 this time, though I dont expect to see them there. Thoses positions(11,12) tomorrow would be a good basis to achieve some points on Sunday.Jef Patat wrote:considering the rest of the season this is not bad
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKq3ii6W8AA5hAe.jpg
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
P8 is good but its 1.8 gap that is too big,and usually everyone else improves for Q except MclarenJef Patat wrote:It feels good, almost too good? It scares me a little
For me, most important for the team this week is for both cars to finish the race so they can obtain more data before the summer break. If in any case we get into the points, that will be just a bonus.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:P8 is good but its 1.8 gap that is too big,and usually everyone else improves for Q except MclarenJef Patat wrote:It feels good, almost too good? It scares me a little