Brilliant idea Ferrari!!! Absolutely brilliant!!! =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>ferkan wrote:Ferrari tricking with Haas? There are reports that Ferrari is using a loophole for aero development by using Haas, new entrant, and its ability to use wind tunnel 24/7 without any restriction. Basically, Ferrari "fired" 70 guys from their aero division just for Haas to hire them and let them work on their car which will apparently be more or less a copy of next Ferrari's one and the one they have been really working on. They will hire those guys again in November...
Mercedes and RBR are furious with Ferrari but even more so because FIA has rejected their proposals with teams HWA and ARDEN that would use wind tunnels to research the possibility of competing one day.
http://f1-insider.com/trickst-ferrari-mit-haas/
Got to say this sounds very cunning and exactly the kind of thing Marchionne would do.
This should all be in a different thread.Fer.Fan wrote:Brilliant idea Ferrari!!! Absolutely brilliant!!! =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>ferkan wrote:Ferrari tricking with Haas? There are reports that Ferrari is using a loophole for aero development by using Haas, new entrant, and its ability to use wind tunnel 24/7 without any restriction. Basically, Ferrari "fired" 70 guys from their aero division just for Haas to hire them and let them work on their car which will apparently be more or less a copy of next Ferrari's one and the one they have been really working on. They will hire those guys again in November...
Mercedes and RBR are furious with Ferrari but even more so because FIA has rejected their proposals with teams HWA and ARDEN that would use wind tunnels to research the possibility of competing one day.
http://f1-insider.com/trickst-ferrari-mit-haas/
Got to say this sounds very cunning and exactly the kind of thing Marchionne would do.
This is what Red Bull has done with Toro Rosso. How do you think Red Bull has become masters in chassis building? By using Toro Rosso as aerotest team.
Well, I guess they discussed this option with the FIA before relocating people to the HAAS windtunnel.drunkf1fan wrote:If they have done that, they have effectively cheated and very badly, the FIA is unlikely to do anything about it though.
People have already talked about this possibility but this would mean going from possible to actual. Also I think most people suspected Ferrari might send a couple guys over, or send them a wing design to send back data on. To me at least firing almost the entire aero design department and sending them over to another team with unlimited aero testing for this year before rehiring them later is a significantly higher level of well, cheating.
Ferrari staff did not relocate to HASS windtunnel they are all working out of the Ferrari windtunnelpciarro wrote:Well, I guess they discussed this option with the FIA before relocating people to the HAAS windtunnel.
Anyway, I don't think it's very different compared to the collaboration between RedBull and ToroRosso.
That being said, I don't think this has anything to do with the progress of this year car. I think they are only working on next year car.
You are right. But it seems they temporary working for HASS.WilliamsF1 wrote:Ferrari staff did not relocate to HASS windtunnel they are all working out of the Ferrari windtunnelpciarro wrote:Well, I guess they discussed this option with the FIA before relocating people to the HAAS windtunnel.
Anyway, I don't think it's very different compared to the collaboration between RedBull and ToroRosso.
That being said, I don't think this has anything to do with the progress of this year car. I think they are only working on next year car.
It looks like they are not breaking any rule.markp wrote:If there is nothing in the rules to prevent this then it cannot be cheating. Same as flexi wings or Brawns ddd in 2009. It is a loophole so congratulations if it helps.
It could even been seen (if it really happens) to be a good thing for F1, if small teams could, either "sell" their development time (what they can't use because of lack of funds) to the big 4, or the big 4 have junior teams with shared development time and components. Just imagine:pciarro wrote:It looks like they are not breaking any rule.markp wrote:If there is nothing in the rules to prevent this then it cannot be cheating. Same as flexi wings or Brawns ddd in 2009. It is a loophole so congratulations if it helps.