Well, I don't know about Tilke's designs
from the point of view of racing. You can argue pro and con.
I've posted many times how the "modern" tracks allow more overtaking.
I've explained why I like the grass strips on the outer edge of curves and why paved areas must substitute leca and gravel.
I've said that the calculation of the "envolvent of possible car trajectories" is
the most important safety device in history of racing.
I've mantained that spiral curves (like number 1 at Shangai, check it next GP) are better for the sport (Nick Heidfeld sustains the opposite:
http://www.f1technical.net/news/7274 )
What I don't argue, what I affirm, is that, from the technical point of view, (and I'm talking highway engineering here) modern tracks are difficult to enhance. They can be, perhaps, more entertaining, but not better.
I dream of a day when roads will be made with the same technical tools. That, for me, is more important than car safety devices.
And let's not talk only about Tilke: what about
- Ed Bargy: author of Talladega and upgrades to Nashville, St. Louis, Road America, and also of my beloved "Race Track Design"
- Roy Propsner, dedicated since 1981 to tracks and "all entertainement facilities"
- Wilson Motorsports: this guy is a legend. Short list of tracks designed: Barber Motorsports Park, Mont Tremblant, BeaveRun, Carolina, Gingerman Raceway, Mid-America, Arizona, Miller, Autobahn Country Club, Motorsports Park, Hastings, Calabogie, Las Vegas, Pikes Peak, Denver, Columbus, Minneapolis, Grand Rapids, Dallas, Addison, Gainesville, TRC Dynamic Handling Course and Kansas?
Alan Wilson, father of Desiré Wilson:
an interview with Wilson about track design, where he speaks about the "laser-smooth, polymer race-mix surface 40 feet wide" tracks he makes.
Ed Bargy
