https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WZt7GjmLzgproteus wrote:the question is, if the 60% model presents 60% of mass as well. Then use of original materials makes sense.
Surface quality, durability and comparitive cost. 3d prints are horrible surface quality, require a lot of post processing to improve, have poor dimensional stability, and just arent durable. The cost would be close to a wash in f1 terms for an inferior product.proteus wrote:I wonder why they dont use simple 3D printed rim out of plastic? Would it not be cheaper and easier to use, or is there a firmer reason to use metal?
The 3D printing machines used by high end industry/space are light years ahead of comsumer grade 3d printers using plastics. Audi are investing heavily in "powder to component" technologies for the whole VW group.sgth0mas wrote:Surface quality, durability and comparitive cost. 3d prints are horrible surface quality, require a lot of post processing to improve, have poor dimensional stability, and just arent durable. The cost would be close to a wash in f1 terms for an inferior product.
Yes ! It would be fantastic for the team ! But this is surprising given his role at Williams; Have you other informations about that ?kptaylor wrote:Silly season continues. Smedley to Haas?
http://www.thisisf1.com/2015/11/20/rob- ... o-williamsRSF1 wrote:Yes ! It would be fantastic for the team ! But this is surprising given his role at Williams; Have you other informations about that ?kptaylor wrote:Silly season continues. Smedley to Haas?