Honestly, I think this is exactly what Lewis needed to get him focused for next year. He knows what change to the car has helped Nico or hurt him (take you pick what it actually is). Nico being his typical smug little self, and the team screwing him over, have only added more reasons to focus. Lewis said he didn't really have a goal after his 3rd title, but I'm willing to bet his goal next year, will be to grind Nico into dust.Phil wrote: Lastly, I really hope this doesn't have an impact on the 2016 season. If I'd be Hamilton, I'd be fuming. I get Mexico, I get Brazil, but I sure as hell did not get this one. Fair enough if the strategist stuffed up and they come up and apologize or simply stick up their hand and explain it, but to act as if everything went according to plan when it didn't is what is seriously damaging team-relations.
So Lewis is still the WDC. No big deal. But for some reason people still turn on their TVs despite the championship is over... but not to see something like this.![]()
PlatinumZealot wrote:I really wonder why Mercedes is making the car slower to please Nico. Lewis said the car is actually slower compared to the comptetion after they changed the suspension.
Or maybe Lewis is full of you know what and is making excusesPlatinumZealot wrote:To get the balance more to his liking Lewis removed one of the dampers in the front suspension just like Barichello did some years ago at Brawn (was the rear suspension in that case?). He lost 1.5 tenths in qualifying because of that change alone, and he had terrible pace on the super soft tyre but his pace on the soft was really good and he had good tyre life too.
I hope the team sort this out or Lewis get's on top of it. I really wonder why Mercedes is making the car slower to please Nico. Lewis said the car is actually slower compared to the comptetion after they changed the suspension. Isn't the engineer's job to make the car faster? Why go backwards? It almost reeks of Mclaren in 2012.
You might be on to something here. It was pretty much since then that the advantage he had over Nico disappeared.Shrieker wrote:I don't know if anyone has mentioned this here or in another thread, but one thing that has changed since Monza is the new tire pressure rule and Hamilton had declared that it was going to be a disaster once the change was announced.
giantfan10 wrote:
Or maybe Lewis is full of you know what and is making excuses
MERC has said the car has not changed... how many races did lewis win after singapore where he claimed the car change happened? Much ado about nothing...
One senior figure in the Mercedes team said the only difference he could see in the data was that Rosberg has improved in the braking phase into the corner.
He can tolerate more rear slip on entry than before, which is allowing him to be more aggressive and winning him time from the entry to apex. This is only gaining hundredths, not 10ths. But when there is only 0.08secs between the drivers over a lap, as in Brazil, that could be decisive.
No to mention Nico went from getting one pole out of the first 12, to all 6 after Singapore, That's not a coincidence.ould the change in the Mercedes car Hamilton referred to be related to this?
The only publicly known tweak to the car is in the way Mercedes treat the tyres ahead of qualifying and race.
This is their response to tyre supplier Pirelli's demand for teams to run higher pressures as well as limiting the maximum temperatures of the tyre following the 200mph failures suffered by Rosberg and Ferrari's Sebastian Vettel at the Belgian Grand Prix in August.
The mandatory minimum pressures are higher than the teams would ideally like to run because they reduce grip - indeed their views were represented in a letter from governing body the FIA to Pirelli ahead of the Brazil race. Pirelli rejected the teams' complaints.
In an attempt to run tyre pressures as low as possible, but still ensure they meet Pirelli's mandatory minimums, Mercedes heat the wheels before the car goes out on track, which raises the tyre pressure when the car is static and allows it to fall down again when they are out on track for better performance.
Treating the wheels and tyres in this way can affect the front-rear balance during braking, and therefore could be an explanation for Rosberg's ability to brake later, accept more "slip" and attack the corner more confidently.
Asked about this, Mercedes executive director (technical) Paddy Lowe admitted: "Tyre pressures have affected changes [to the car] through that period."
Basically although Alonso beat Hamilton in BS department this race, he caused the whole start situation, cut Nasr, lost the car, rammed into Maldo and complained about the clearest penalty ever. A "high driving standards" hypocrite.giantfan10 wrote:Or maybe Lewis is full of you know what and is making excusesPlatinumZealot wrote:To get the balance more to his liking Lewis removed one of the dampers in the front suspension just like Barichello did some years ago at Brawn (was the rear suspension in that case?). He lost 1.5 tenths in qualifying because of that change alone, and he had terrible pace on the super soft tyre but his pace on the soft was really good and he had good tyre life too.
I hope the team sort this out or Lewis get's on top of it. I really wonder why Mercedes is making the car slower to please Nico. Lewis said the car is actually slower compared to the comptetion after they changed the suspension. Isn't the engineer's job to make the car faster? Why go backwards? It almost reeks of Mclaren in 2012.
MERC has said the car has not changed... how many races did lewis win after singapore where he claimed the car change happened? Much ado about nothing...
Out of the drivers on that list:dans79 wrote:I bet next year Nico will take over the #1 all time spot.![]()
![]()
http://s15.postimg.org/a6ody4ga3/Nico.jpg
There's a problem with that; It's practically impossible for the driver to make certain decisions with little to no feedback of what is happening around him. Compare this to the team and specifically the race-engineer who is sitting at the track with an array of monitors in front of him, seeing the respective gaps to every single car on the grid, their sector times and know exactly on what tires they are on, how many laps they all did on them etc. This all has a bearing on the optimal strategy. How then could any driver, who's driving more or less at the limit with two tiny side-mirrors and no one ahead of him (he was leading at that point), make a better decision or know what is going on around him?Vasconia wrote:According to some newspapers Mercedes gave Hamilton the chanche to choose the strategy. I think he tried too hard with the tyres and he wanted to keep the same tyres until the last lap, which was quite stupid indeed.