Does it feel good to get that off your chest?Felipe 92 wrote: Your favorite driver won WDC and you write endless posts just to reduce significance of Rosberg`s pole positions and race wins.Rosberg won 6 poles and 3 races in a row,get over it.
Does it feel good to get that off your chest?Felipe 92 wrote: Your favorite driver won WDC and you write endless posts just to reduce significance of Rosberg`s pole positions and race wins.Rosberg won 6 poles and 3 races in a row,get over it.
Not really, viewership in Germany went down again this year, and Lewis is a much larger personality globally.wesley123 wrote: If you would put both of those together it sounds like Mercedes would be favoring Rosberg. And it would make sense, a German winning for a German brand would suit very well.
Braking problems you mention? There is something which might worry you even more about lewis' driving. There is an article on official f1 website, basically a Q&A with nico rosberg. The interviewer asks if he has still got problems with his brakes and nico said that he is still not comfortable with brakes and is working closely with the manufacturer as it is a long process because a brake needs six months of baking. So apparently nico ia beating Lewis while being handicapped somewhat because of his brakes. Go figure.Edax wrote:"Same for both" is not necessarily true. Rosberg and Hamilton are running different brands brake systems (disks/calipers) as well as a different master cylinder arrangement. So from a braking viewpoint these are different cars and may react differently to a general setup change. Since the problem is in braking I think that cannot be dismissed as possible cause.muhammadtalha.13893 wrote: So either way its setup to go as fast as possible, same for both Nico and Lewis right. Now go figure why the so called best driver on the grid started all the BS.
Perhaps that's why Rosberg hasn't won a championship - he's not pressing for every advantage at every opportunity. Would Vettel, Alonso or any other champion "put up with" a problem or would they be searching for reasons and fighting for changes?muhammadtalha.13893 wrote:IMHO, it goes both ways. If what Hamilton says is true, then Rosberg was severely disadvantage through the whole season. The same happened to him that the car did not suit his driving style. But he did not complain and made the best possible outcome that he could and everyone kept praising Lewis for his winnings. Now that it turned the other way around, everyone starts to think of this as a problem. This probably cost Rosberg the championship and no one cared. Just my two cents...
No, you would suggest that Mercedes are looking for one driver to win them titles. And that, so far, has proven to be Hamilton. If they want a proven winner they'd go with Hamilton. If they just want a German figurehead they'll go with Rosberg. But if/when the field catches up with Mercedes you'd want the better racer in the car and that, without doubt, is Hamilton.wesley123 wrote:Toto Wolff said a few things about the drivers' rivalry and how he did not like it
source: http://www.shropshirestar.com/sport/uk- ... oto-wolff/
If you would put both of those together it sounds like Mercedes would be favoring Rosberg. And it would make sense, a German winning for a German brand would suit very well.Going forward, we will consider if it is the best set-up for the team. Personality and character within the team is a crucial ingredient for the team success.
"If we feel that it is not aligned with the general consensus, spirit and philosophy within the team, we might consider that when we take a decision, in terms of the driver line-up going forward.
Exactly, I have often read or heard that the most aggressive confrontations between Senna & Prost happened in team briefings and not on track. They argued vigorously over every change to make sure it either benefited them, or was neutral for both.Just_a_fan wrote: Perhaps that's why Rosberg hasn't won a championship - he's not pressing for every advantage at every opportunity. Would Vettel, Alonso or any other champion "put up with" a problem or would they be searching for reasons and fighting for changes?
Yep, just like earlier this year, when they changed the clutch springs back to what they used in 2014. Lewis complained because he felt they helped Nico, because they where less sensitive, and made the start easier to get right.Just_a_fan wrote: There is an oft said argument that titles are won by drivers in the best cars. One of the jobs of a driver is to get in the best car and to get that car working how he wants it to work. Hamilton, like Vettel and many others, has won in the best car because he's striven to make sure he's in the best car and then made sure the car is how he wants it.
I am a bit too old to fall for that trap.muhammadtalha.13893 wrote: Braking problems you mention? There is something which might worry you even more about lewis' driving. There is an article on official f1 website, basically a Q&A with nico rosberg. The interviewer asks if he has still got problems with his brakes and nico said that he is still not comfortable with brakes and is working closely with the manufacturer as it is a long process because a brake needs six months of baking. So apparently nico ia beating Lewis while being handicapped somewhat because of his brakes. Go figure.
[/quote]muhammadtalha.13893 wrote:he didn't complain because he didn't know any better. The car was set up by the team to go around the track as fast as possible, not because it was set up to favor Lewis! The team made the change to deal with the tire pressure regulation changes, & to address the gaping technical problem that Singapore exposed.
Which it would be great for F1 but not for Hamilton´s engineer who will listen to Hamilton´s complains every race.Shrieker wrote:So flynfrog locked the other thread, I was late to the party
I'm almost convinced after reading the replies there (and here), whatever it was that caused almost half a second of a swing between two drivers in qualifying is about the new tire pressure rule and the related changes that Mercedes made. That will be a fresh challenge for Hamilton next season, considering Rosberg's pace after the changes.
dans79 wrote:Up to an including Singapore, Lewis was out qualifying Nico by an average of 0.276 seconds, after Singapore the average swings to 0.191 seconds in Nico's favor. That's a swing of 0.467 seconds, You might get a tenth maybe even 2 from mental approaches, but your not going to see almost a half second swing at this level without a technical change of some kind, specially across multiple races.