silly? like silly seasonChrisF1 wrote:That is silly. Maldonando, Palmer have contracts at Lotus (Renault) and Alonso at Mclaren. It wouldn't make sense to do anything in 2016 which is a transitional year.FrukostScones wrote:ALO MAL at Renault 2016
or ALO BUE
Yeah. Monisha was hinting that they could be a Honda team in 2017.Joseki wrote:I think Sauber will be much more independent from Ferrari with Haas in F1.
I suspect the reality of having Vandoorne sitting around with nowhere to put him will see Mclaren / Honda try and snap at least one team to be their satellite, as well as the benefit of the extra data and Honda's apparent promise to supply more than one team.PlatinumZealot wrote:Yeah. Monisha was hinting that they could be a Honda team in 2017.Joseki wrote:I think Sauber will be much more independent from Ferrari with Haas in F1.
Can't see Ferrari going for Bottas, more likely Verstappen or Sainz? Certainly I reckon the former will find himself in a front running seat in 2017, be that an RBR, Ferrari or a Merc.continuum16 wrote:I know it's a bit far off, but if Williams doesn't deliver next year, Bottas will leave (provided he handily beats Massa), going to Ferrari (unless here's a fallout at merc), If sauber went to Honda they could get vandoorne and Nasr and be reasonably competitive. A competitive Renault in 2017 might be desirable for a verstappen or Hulkenburg, and who knows, Maybe ricciardo or kvyat could fill button's spot if he retires.
Seems there's a possibility those contracts may not carry over to Renault after all...ChrisF1 wrote:That is silly. Maldonando, Palmer have contracts at Lotus (Renault) and Alonso at Mclaren. It wouldn't make sense to do anything in 2016 which is a transitional year.FrukostScones wrote:ALO MAL at Renault 2016
or ALO BUE
what debacle?continuum16 wrote:The only reason vandoorne would not be in mclaren in year one is that maybe they'd test the waters with him in another team to get experience so that there wouldn't be another magnussen-type debacle.
You don't really believe that Vergne is better than Maldo? Apart from accomplishment that are not a matter of preferences there are team-mates, on one side Bottas, Barrichello and Grosjean and on the other only RB program drivers that wasted opportunity after opportunity in '15 (biggest in Hungary, USA but others too) on top of destroying chassis after chassis (facts not up to voting) instead of providing feedback of coursekptaylor wrote:I'd rather see Maldonado lose his seat to Vergne. If it's a write off why not have someone who can provide chassis feedback rather than just destroy one after another?
Disagree about 'the only reason'. Why isn't he now then, they're not testing him in any other team either. What if nothing changes including Button/Alonso and seats available = two reasons?continuum16 wrote:The only reason vandoorne would not be in mclaren in year one is that maybe they'd test the waters with him in another team to get experience so that there wouldn't be another magnussen-type debacle.