According to Alex Zanardi that crash showed a big problem of F1 cars at Indy : they run in the opposite direction compared with the original design. In fact at the exit of corners the barrier is made with a “soft wall” able to absorb the energy of the cars, but since the exit of the F1 corner is actually the straight line there’s no soft wall there. That, coupled with the fact that the car apparently is almost intact (although there’s the crash structure on the rear), means that the driver’s body had to absorb probably an higher deceleration than, for example, in the typical crash of an IRL race.
OT Zanardi claimed a couple of times that the rupture of the front part of the chassis during his crash (that caused him to lose both legs) is probably what saved his life because that reduced the deceleration his body had to cope with.
Guest wrote:
Today proved that if you're going to participate in racing that the best safety team in the world is at Indianapolis.
To require 1 min and 45 seconds for the first marshal to reach a unconscious driver isn’t what I call the showcase of the best safety team in the world.
Looking at the race from tv I had in fact the opposite feeling compared with yours, it looked like the episode, just like the whole race, was managed in a quite inefficient way.