mx_tifosi wrote:Alonso returning to Renault is not official as of today, its mere speculation that has all of you celebrating way too early before victory. My suggestion, don't get your hopes up.
But of course

You are thinking along a moral/mutual acceptance lines when sporting regulations make it clear. It is against the sporting code of conduct. In the situation you suggest Ferrari would be obliged, as a competitor in F1, to ask him to take them away and - to cover their own arses incase it came out later - notify the FIA about it.ss_collins wrote:openly offered data is not an issue. If ron dennis went to Ferrari an said heres our data they would say thank you very much...
Is that not what ferrari did to Mclaren?? Nigel Stepney, an employee of Ferrari, and therefore a representative of ferrari offered Mclaren lots of data....See I never understood why this was never brought up... In my view although it was wrong of Mclaren to accept, Ferrari must take some blame for Nigel Stepney giving the data to Mclaren, They should keep their own house in order?! I know some may disagree with this point of view, but you have to admit it is just that!ss_collins wrote:openly offered data is not an issue. If ron dennis went to Ferrari an said heres our data they would say thank you very much...
its only when its not authorised when you get a problem
Without doubt Alonso's contract is dependent on him driving in the races. It's a total no-brainer. If they don't want him to race, he will be free to leave and they wont be able to stop him.DaveKillens wrote:My first opinion is that Dennis will enforce the contract, hang on to Alonso, and force him on a year-long vacation away from F1. And there's nothing Fernando can do about it but whine and complain.....
Do you have a link about Timo Glock. Havn't heard anything yet.Militia Est Vita wrote:What about Williams for Piquet? Sounds like a possibility.Schumi we miss you wrote:Oh if Fernando would be back in Renault then What about Piquet Jr? When would he be given a chance?
When Fernando or Heikki leave or retire??
Toyota just signed Timo Glock and they were trying to get Alonso, so that means that they already know that Alonso will definetly join Renault next year.
Why so ignorant? Where was Williams last year? Mclaren in 2004 (regarding 05 season).tomislavp4 wrote:The chanses to see him fighting for the title next year are small then, considering how well renault is doing![]()
But I can´t wait to see him out of McLaren
I agree, Dennis is a bit of a tight stingy man on these things. Good recent comparison was when Kimi went to Ferrari, Mclaren didn't release him till Jan 1 2007. Renault/Flavio released Alonso way before. Dennis just had to be an ass?DaveKillens wrote:It's difficult to imagine how Alonso can have a ride in McLaren next year, title or not. There is so much ill feeling between Alonso and Dennis I think any relationship is not workable.
First off, will Dennis be willing to throw away about 20 million just to punish Alonso by sitting him out all next season. He does have a very good contract with Alonso, and it's Dennis's decision if, and when Alonso leaves McLaren.
If he does go, I see only renault welcoming him. Who can really trust this guy anymore? I bet that even at Ferrari, they are nervous about having Alonso. He's a loose cannon, willing to damage his own team to further his personal agenda.
My first opinion is that Dennis will enforce the contract, hang on to Alonso, and force him on a year-long vacation away from F1. And there's nothing Fernando can do about it but whine and complain.....
de la Rosa and Alonso should disclosed that they had access to Ferrari data earlier. At the first hearing, Dennis convinced WMSC that no secret Ferrari information circulated in McLaren. That proved to be untrue at the second hearing. And once again i remind you: Alonso tried to blackmail Dennis.Rob W wrote: At the time of the 'threat' Alonso knew already that an appeal hearing was coming up - and that McLaren was possibly in for closer scrutiny. He did not cause their problems and, as I said in another thread, his threat actually started the chain of events which resulted in both Hamilton and himself still being in the championship at all. This is a fact. Legally and from all comments made by Mosley - the only reason the McLaren drivers are still in the competition is because of Ron going to the FIA and sparking them to offer the immunity for immediate disclosure from the drivers. You could argue they should be thanking Alonso for them being able to race at all at the moment.
Rob W
You are wrong:bizadfar wrote: I agree, Dennis is a bit of a tight stingy man on these things. Good recent comparison was when Kimi went to Ferrari, Mclaren didn't release him till Jan 1 2007. Renault/Flavio released Alonso way before. Dennis just had to be an ass?![]()
Wikipedia wrote: On December 19, 2005, Fernando Alonso announced that he would be moving to McLaren for 2007. His contract with Renault was set to expire on December 31, 2006 However, on December 15, 2006, Alonso was allowed by Flavio Briatore and the Renault F1 Team to test for one day for McLaren in the Jerez circuit, as a result of his successes with Renault.
For sure, I have no issue with that. It is a fair call. But I'd say they were weeks, if not months, behind the initial information swapping. Alonso is being blamed for stuff which he was 3rd, 4th or even 5th person down the chain - it just suits the news writers to talk about him because he is a public figure. (No-one really thinks that drug-using athletes make the drugs themselves do they? They just buy them from someone - but we never remember that person's name because they're irrelevant).astsmtl wrote:de la Rosa and Alonso should disclosed that they had access to Ferrari data earlier. At the first hearing, Dennis convinced WMSC that no secret Ferrari information circulated in McLaren.