data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1701d/1701d64cff5ecb016343899fc102d293d36e4a07" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52d1b/52d1b7ccd0c2ccd2a0cfc2bbdde83cd7c3715ba9" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0969d/0969d70f5d3d12d21cbbcf9925bd64b71e970c47" alt="Image"
Full gallery Here
http://www.newsf1.it/test-barcellona-ii-day-2/
In general very good patterns. No visible traces of separation. no significant adverse flow patterns. Which is quite an achievement looking at the rake they are running.lio007 wrote: Any aero comments on that...would be appreciated.
Good or bad flow patterns?
I guess you are talking about the 335 km/h Ricciardo did yesterday? This imho was done in slipstream.Sevach wrote: Both Renaults right up there in straight line speed, i didn't expect that.
I agree, the car just looks smooth.ringo wrote:Very clean and simple looking car. No fancy rear wing end plates or turning vanes. Just extremely refined shape and most compact design imo.
ringo wrote:Very clean and simple looking car. No fancy rear wing end plates or turning vanes. Just extremely refined shape and most compact design imo.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Would it be a fair assumption that there is no S-Duct to come?